Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Republicans: Do you know where your political donations are?
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 6:12 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (5 comments) [164 views]

James Comer hopes for divine intervention to save him from embarrassing impeachment fiasco.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:05 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (1 comments) [66 views]

Donna may be getting her wish granted: Gateway Pundit to file for bankruptcy
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:28 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [21 views]

So Ukraine got money.
Military by oldedude     April 24, 2024 3:58 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (5 comments) [76 views]

Trump, Giuliani, Meadows are unindicted co-conspirators in Michigan fake elector case, hearing reveals
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 4:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (3 comments) [33 views]

Russia is even more furious over vote by Congress to support Ukraine than MTG.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (11 comments) [630 views]

The latest general election polls from this weekend reveal something interesting.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 22, 2024 11:03 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (8 comments) [379 views]

Clearly Joe's serious about choosing freedom over democracy!
President by HatetheSwamp     April 24, 2024 4:49 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [4 views]

Arizona grand jury has indicted Trump allies for 2020 election interference
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 4:48 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [9 views]

The Oval Office Oaf calls for "Four more years. Pause."
Entertainment by HatetheSwamp     April 24, 2024 2:56 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [10 views]

Media selectors, pages, etc.
Tucker Ep. 2: White Supremacy
By HatetheSwamp
June 8, 2023 3:29 pm
Category: Media

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post
SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

I've got to say, I never liked his Fox show but this TUCKER ON TWITTER this is Da Bomb.

Cited and related links:

  1. twitter.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Tucker Ep. 2: White Supremacy ":

  1. by Curt_Anderson on June 8, 2023 4:08 pm
    Interesting how Tucker lists old taboos that are no longer taboos. He claims that "until fairly recently it was taboo to attack people based on their race". Really? Emmitt Till, Medgar Evans, Martin Luther King, John Lewis, et cetera would beg to differ.

    He then brings up sexual taboos that are no longer taboos. I thought for sure he would mention the thrice married, philander, porn star john, pussy grabber Donald Trump. Instead he made a vague innuendo about Barack Obama. When he talked about being sexually inappropriate with minors, I thought for sure he'd bring up Trump who bragged to Howard Stern about how he strolled into the dressing room of beauty pageant he owned to ogle the naked and semi-naked teenage girls. But no, Tucker didn't go there.

    I am sure that Tucker will find an audience among the fact-adverse who liked his fact-free tirades on Fox.

  2. by HatetheSwamp on June 8, 2023 5:13 pm

    Trump Trump Trump Trump
    Trump Trump Trump Trump
    Trump Trump Trump Trump...TRUMP!

  3. by oldedude on June 8, 2023 8:32 pm
    He claims that "until fairly recently it was taboo to attack people based on their race". Really? Emmitt Till, Medgar Evans, Martin Luther King, John Lewis, et cetera would beg to differ.

    So you agree with Tucker... "until fairly recently it was taboo to attack people based on their race" Are you saying the murders of these men, AND those hung from trees were both "Fairly recent" and Horrible?

    Did curt and I see the same thing? Maybe he didn't say anything about the pedophiles for a reason... Like Tucker said...

  4. by Curt_Anderson on June 8, 2023 8:56 pm
    "Are you saying the murders of these men, AND those hung from trees were both "Fairly recent" and Horrible?" ---OD

    Of course those murders were horrible...but not recent. Tucker said "until fairly recently it was taboo to attack people based on their race".

  5. by oldedude on June 9, 2023 4:35 am
    "Of course those murders were horrible...but not recent. Tucker said "until fairly recently it was taboo to attack people based on their race"."

    This biggest issue between us is "recently" is a relative term. My view is that historically, it was recently. They were in our lifetime, so even in the short history of our nation, it's recently. It's a problem with a relative term.

    I remember seeing pictures of blacks hung in trees during the 60's, and pictures in the magazines of crosses burning, and a couple of crosses burning in front of houses. My parents actually talked about it and racism (on my level at the time). It left quite an impression on me obviously. That's one of the reasons, MLKs "I have a dream" speech made such an impact on me, and his march in Selma. With all the other violence (especially later), I really saw MLKjr as someone that was different.

    So I just looked at it though a historical lens.

Go To Top

Comment on: "Tucker Ep. 2: White Supremacy "


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
 SelectSmart.com home page