By HatetheSwamp October 18, 2024 7:23 am Category: Politics (0.0 from 0 votes) Rules of the Post Write A New Article How To Post Here Rate this article (5=best, 0=poor)

... for JD.

I decided long ago... and made it perfectly clear. I despise Trump. I will not vote for him.

I think Trump is despicable...

...and, Kammy is a dingbat. And, Tampon is an oaf.

In my opinion, 024 provides the most lamentable choice on the presidential ballot in my lifetime... by far.

I was clear. From the beginning, I planned to vote for the No Labels candidate. That choice was settled... until No Labels couldn't find a candidate.

I considered the Libertarian candidate, Chase Oliver, but he's just too weird for ole pb.

Then, I, uncomfortably, decided to vote for RFKJ until he dropped out to campaign for Trump.

Oy freakin friggin EFFINvey!

I was at a loss... until Trump chose JD Vance.

Vance has performed so courageously and intelligently as he bounced around the Sunday morning shows, eviscerating on progressive SwampMedia host after another...

...and, then, performed brilliantly in that 3 against 1 Veep debate, which transformed the campaign. If you doubt ole pb about that, trace the change in both the polls and the betting markets since the day of the debate.

If the polls are wrong in the same way they were in 020, Trump will win the friggin popular vote!...

... all since JD Vance won the Veep debate.

A truth about the 024 campaign is that people seem to actually be voting for Vice President. pb certainly is.

So, pb voted. Mail-in. The ballot is in the mail. He cast his vote for the GOP ticket... so he could vote for JD Vance.

Incidentally, this ain't the first time pb voted based on the Veep candidate. In 88, pb despised both presidential candidates: Dukakis and Bush. pb recalls vividly. He went into the voting booth and immediately pulled the Dukakis lever... with the idea that he'd let that reality simmer while he worked on the rest of the ballot. About halfway through, be changed to Bush. He finished the ballot and decided...

... Bush's selection of Dan Quayle was a disaster, and if that choice indicates how Bush will govern, pb doesn't want Bush in the White House. So, pb re-pulled the Dukakis lever and cast his ballot. pb has never regretted voting in 88 based on the Veep choice.

So,... pb's voting for the Veep. For JD Vance and against Tampon Timmy Walz.

Comments Start Below

by Ponderer on October 18, 2024 7:30 am As it was foretold. Without any doubt whatsoever. by Donna on October 18, 2024 7:39 am Wow. I actually believed you when you said that you weren't going to vote for Trump. I feel like such a chump. Never again, though. by Ponderer on October 18, 2024 9:29 am We mailed out our ballots off on Tuesday. We did not vote for Trump, as everyone here knew Hate would. by Indy! on October 18, 2024 10:29 am I never once wavered from the idea pb was voting for his favorite shit stain again. You're such a weak-ass poseur, peebs. Just another dyed in the wool wingnut who doesn't believe in America. by Curt_Anderson on October 18, 2024 10:41 am So HtS voted for Trump after all. What a surprise...NOT!! That reminds me that I heard a report about undecided voters (you know, morons) this morning on NPR. One undecided voter said she was 50/50 between Harris and Trump. She was concerned about gas prices if Harris is elected, but was concerned about losing her rights if Trump was elected. That is an awful attitude. So apparently she would willing give up constitutional rights if the price of gasoline was reduced to her liking. by Ponderer on October 18, 2024 11:10 am Sometimes I think that the movie Idiocracy was set 500 years too far into the future. by Donna on October 18, 2024 11:15 am To anyone who hasn't seen the movie Idiocracy, see it. When I watched it, which was before Trump ran for president, I could see that America was heading towards that, but I didn't think we'd devolve as quickly as we did. by Indy! on October 18, 2024 11:55 am Remember when we thought nobody could ever top Bush for idiocy? Good times. 😐 by Ponderer on October 18, 2024 12:01 pm "Hey George... Hold my beer..." by HatetheSwamp on October 19, 2024 3:48 am Gang, pb did not EFFIN vote for Trump. He voted for the GOP ticket due to his admiration for JD Vance. Back in the day, one could vote for a presidential candidate from one party and Veep from another. Today? I'm a prisoner of the system. Had I been able to, I would have voted for JD and did a write-in, either for Tulsi or Sheri Gwendolyn Evans. But,... I read HILLBILLY ELEGY, even before JD was elected to the Senate. I was impressed by the hillbilly part of the story. I've noted many times that my mom was born in Appalachia. I relate to JD's story,... almost tearfully... and I admire him. I thought, when I read the book: This is the very sort of PERSON we need in DC. He became a devout Christian in adulthood and lives the life sincerely. His book tells the story of his marriage to a woman of color and of his devotion to his family. He has forgiven his addicted mother who exposed him to a horrible childhood until he was raised by his grandmother. He's been courageous as a candidate, going into hostile situations on a daily basis and handling insults with grace and conviction. I do disagree with a lot of his MAGA politics. I actually agree with his views pre MAGA more than his current views. And, I, still, despise Trump... but voted for the GOP ticket in spite of Trump. ***** I continue to support Kammy, to support Kammy. I HatetheSwamp. I'll get a kick out of seeing the Dingbat in the White House for four years. I just can't spend my vote on that airhead. by Ponderer on October 19, 2024 6:52 am "pb did not EFFIN vote for Trump." -Hate And so, my fellow SelectSmarters, Hate's descent into abject delusion and separation from reality has finally hit rock bottom. With that statement, he has splattered himself all over bedrock. He voted for Donald Trump, and now he's trying to construct a parallel reality in which he didn't vote for Donald Trump. Because he said he wouldn't. But then he did. And he still wants his promise not to vote for Donald Trump to hold true. He wants it both ways. He always wants things both ways. He is a flaming fucking hypocrite and a despicable, disgusting liar. And he is also the quintessential modern Republican/MAGA Party member. These pathetically gullible people were made to be used by an immoral con artist like Donald Trump. He can effortlessly lead them around by the golden rings they have let him put in their noses. Donald Trump is a stark raving lunatic descending into literal madness. They don't care. He is a multiply convicted felon. They don't care. He is a literal traitor to the country and its systems of laws and justice. They don't care. He is an immoral, racist white supremacist and misogynistic sex offender. They don't care. He is a profligate scam artist, blatantly only out for himself and no one else. They don't care. He sides with the worst despotic leaders of the world against our country's best interests and for his own aggrandizement. They don't care. To them, he is their cult's leader. To them, he is innocent of all crimes he ever commits. To them, his ignorance and incompetence are wisdom beyond human comprehension. To them, anyone who disagrees with or criticizes him is The Enemy. To them, his lies are made Truth by the mere uttering of them through his divine, pig-ass-shaped lips. To them, all is whatever he says it all is. To them, he is the Lord God returned to seek vengeance. To them and pb, His Will Be Done. "Wanna buy a Bible?" by Ponderer on October 19, 2024 7:11 am "Back in the day, one could vote for a presidential candidate from one party and Veep from another. Today? I'm a prisoner of the system." -Hate Ah yes... Those glorious, halcyon days before 1804... Oh Bill, how you must pine longingly for that long-lost golden age from which you were so heartlessly yanked by the cruel Fate of Time...! 😢 by HatetheSwamp on October 19, 2024 7:20 am I support the Dingbat. I support Cackles Mckneepads. And,... I despise Trump, po. But,... It strikes me that the lies you lot and believed... and spread... about JD as a hater of "childless catladies"... may lose you the election. Very literally. Polls and betting odds began a wild swing to the GOPs at the moment of the Veep debate... BECAUSE... people were inclined to believe the progressive SwampMedia propaganda about JD... until they saw him in action. Since then, Trump's polls have improved to the point that, as Nate Silver says, and bettors are betting, he'll win. Based on how RCP and 538 underestimated Trump's vote in 020, Trump likely would win the popular vote if the election were held today. I don't know if you actually believe your description of Trump. Apparently, Ms Mckneepads does. But, in the eyes of undecideds and moderate and independent common sense voters, what you say about Trump simply doesn't comport with what their eyes and ears tell them. It's deranged TrumpHate. It makes people sympathetic toward Trump... and, he's pulling into the lead. by Ponderer on October 19, 2024 7:25 am "I despise Trump, po. But,..." -Hate ...you went ahead and voted for him anyways. After you had declared that you wouldn't. You are a hypocrite and a liar. And now you're just being an asshole. by HatetheSwamp on October 19, 2024 7:36 am Let me start off with two words. I support Kammy. I support the Dingbat. po, I detailed my blind support for No Labels. And, my internal struggle over voting for Chase Oliver and my decision to back RFKJ. AND, ultimately, my evolving admiration for JD. It's mere happenstance that demands that my vote for JD must also be a vote for OrangeTurdBad. I didn't make the system, and... ... I didn't vote for Trump. ***** I believe a Trump presidency will be a four alarm dumpster fire. But, it is what it is. by Ponderer on October 19, 2024 8:08 am You are gone, Bill. You're just gone. There's nothing there now but a blabbering, willfully ignorant cult follower playing with reality like a toddler with Silly Putty. And all to defend and fortify your pitifully fragile ego that won't allow you to accept the fact that you in fact fucking voted for Donald Trump. You knew all along that you were going to. We could all see it. We all knew you would vote for Donald Trump. And you did. All except for Donna. She actually took you at your word and believed that you would not vote for Donald Trump. And she said so. She unfortunately learned what the rest of us already knew, which was that your word is meaningless. It means nothing. Your word is worthless garbage. Yeah. You're gone. "Wanna buy a watch?" by HatetheSwamp on October 19, 2024 8:14 am "You knew all along that you were going to." There's nuthin like woke delusions of omniscience. Thanks. And, please, don't ever change. by Ponderer on October 19, 2024 8:17 am I noticed, with some mirth, that you did not deny it. by Indy! on October 19, 2024 11:28 am Excellent rant, Pondy - dead on. 👍 PB voted for Trump. We knew it the whole time, never wavered, never questioned it for a moment. That's his hero - the guy who thinks, acts and lives his life exactly the way peebs does (minus the cash). by HatetheSwamp on October 19, 2024 12:28 pm po, This whole thread is the denial. by Indy! on October 19, 2024 12:33 pm Why limit it to this thread? Your entire life has been denial. Your vote however - is an honest act representing your true feelings that you cannot deny, Trumper. by meagain on October 19, 2024 2:57 pm America is already an idiocracy. The number of votes Trump will attract is proof of that and a system that enables that is proof that your founders were idiots too. I get some fun out of teasing you here about America, but in all seriousness, I think it is not too far from social collapse and Trump could be the trigger, I believe him to be the most dangerous leader in the world: more dangerous that Putin simply because of his isolationist wishes in a time when I is more critical than at any time in hsy=tory that the democratic world stick tightly together. There is no need to say what I believe about his character. Pondy used most of the more apt adjectives in her post above. I could add a couple but why pile on? America's biggest problem is what I often refer to in these threads. Its Constitution is as one of the founders ( I think it was one of them ) said, merely a parchment. It is a paper tiger and almost all its protections have been watered down and its vaunted separation of powers is a joke. Congress long ago ceded most of its power to the Presidency and the Supreme Court routinely misinterprets the Constitution to approve limitations on the protected freedoms. Had you stuck with English Common Law and merely arranged the administrative details of a federation, you would be far better protected as well as not being the gun and gun homicide capital of the world and a country where women are second-class citizens and coloured are in practice through much of the country still "separate but equal?" All that apart, here is an interesting finding by a non-American and non-partisan source 338 Canada. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/donald-trump-loses-three-states-in-electoral-college-map-model/ar-AA1svt04?ocid=nl_article_link by Donna on October 19, 2024 3:45 pm I think that the most telling statistic on how this election will go might be favorability rating. It's hard to imagine how anyone who has an unfavorable opinion about a candidate would vote for that candidate. 538 has Harris's favorability at -0.7, with 46.5 favorable and 47.2 unfavorable. 538 has Trump's favorability at -9.4 with 43.2 favorable and 52.6 unfavorable. So while all of the national and state polling has the race a virtual toss-up, the one stat that isn't even close is their favorability rating. by Indy! on October 19, 2024 4:14 pm There it is - meagain's perpetual self-righteous bullshit. The guy who didn't understand Miranda (and still doesn't) is trying to teach us something about law. I find it interesting his holier than thou stiff upper Brit ass keeps pulling English Common Law out of his incredibly tight rectum as the standard bearer for good governing - yet even he didn't want to live on that shitty island we have to keep saving every time they start a world war. Oh... and Canada? She's always been and always will be our bitch. You're the lapdog - we tell you what to do if you want to get fed. Now sit there like a good dog and quit your yapping. by meagain on October 19, 2024 4:52 pm I told you repeatedly, indy, that your Miranda law was a copy of British and Canadian. It was in effect here much earlier As for your Constitution, it appears that I know it far better than you do. It has become almost meaningless as your Courts routinely support the federal government's encroachments. Take just one instance. Executive Orders. They are, by definition, Uncomstitutional. For example. Only Congress can declare war. Right? How many wars have been started through executive Orders recently while Congress meekly allows it? And I could lecture you about Freedom of Speech and the 14th. Amendment, but I won't. by meagain on October 19, 2024 5:03 pm Also, you did not ever save England. American troops did not even participate in WW1 until it was almost over and Germany was on the ropes. And, I'm WWII, You came in long after Hitler gave up on Britain and turned on Russia. The turning point of the war at El Alamein was won two weeks before the first Americans landed in North Africa. I had two brothers who were there. In effect, Germany had lost when it lost the Battle of Britain, the air battle and the Luftwaffe was beaten. It was just time and attrition after that. That is not a criticism of America or its military, by the way. It was a political problem for you. Also, I had many American relatives who were in that fight. FYI. The "bomb" was also your creation because the British government turned over its research as part of the Destroyer deal and America's entry into the war. The American Pacific action did greatly help the freeing of British Asiatic colonies. by HatetheSwamp on October 19, 2024 6:39 pm "I think that the most telling statistic on how this election will go might be favorability rating. It's hard to imagine how anyone who has an unfavorable opinion about a candidate would vote for that candidate. Donna, You'd think. Trump's favorability in 016, when he won, was -21. realclearpolitics.com by Indy! on October 19, 2024 7:40 pm That's it - the sanctimonious blowhard Canuck who hates his own country so much he won't live there. You got no room to talk and you still don't understand Miranda. You never will - you are incapable. You confuse knowledge with intelligence. You have very little of the former and almost none of the latter. My dog could tell me more about the Constitution than you. by oldedude on October 19, 2024 9:48 pm princess. STFU. you're embarrassing yourself. by oldedude on October 19, 2024 10:12 pm America is already an idiocracy. The number of votes Trump will attract is proof of that and a system that enables that is proof that your founders were idiots too. I get some fun out of teasing you here about America, but in all seriousness, I think it is not too far from social collapse and Trump could be the trigger, I believe him to be the most dangerous leader in the world: more dangerous that Putin simply because of his isolationist wishes in a time when I is more critical than at any time in hsy=tory that the democratic world stick tightly together. you're comparing a republic to a constitutional monarchy. Two different things. Yes, you have "common law" which means someone can have a wet fart and the law is changed. You feel good with that. We don't. Never forget you don't live here, and are therefore not subject to its freedoms. Your government (canadian) was under severe stress when your dipshit PM put through "laws" that absolutely destroyed the trucking industry. You weren't around for that for us to talk about, were you? Other cuntries sworn to a monarch were almost destroyed by their PM in Holland which almost destroyed their entire export industry in the milk and chocolate industry. Germany is having riots in the streets, as well as France. Britian is also under assault and riots in the streets. All of these are "constitutional" monarchies. You may want to rethink your hatred of the US. Whatever the "reason" for these protests and riots is immaterial. They prove they're governments that do NOT serve the people, much like the last (not present) french "revolution." by Indy! on October 20, 2024 1:06 am Is OD trying to play internet tough guy again? 🤡 by Donna on October 20, 2024 8:44 am Hts - Interesting stat from 2016. The thing is, Hillary won the popular vote by over 3 million, so her favorability advantage over Trump was reflected by the popular vote, but not the electoral vote. So you make a valid point. by HatetheSwamp on October 20, 2024 9:34 am Interestingly, Kammy's favorability is, suddenly, tanking and is now negative. See link. I've been making the point that she's lost the advantage she has over Trump in likablity. Her nastiness in the Bret Baier, which progressives didn't see, was apparent to everyone who's not a supporter. realclearpolling.com by meagain on October 20, 2024 10:09 am Sublime nonsense, od. Even by your accepted standards that is too funny. There are just fifteen Constitutional Monarchies in the world yet in rankings of political stability, 5 of the top ten countries are Constitutional Monarchies. That is why I favour them, not because of any fealty to persons. They provide a stable central platform to the 'warring' discrete elements of any society that a piece of paper cannot. Trudeau destroyed the trucking industry. I know he was responsible for the genocidal attacks on the Rohingyas: for the drought in California: for the pools of water appearing on the Antarctic ice, and for Trump's bone spurs, but the destruction of the trucking industry is a new one. by meagain on October 20, 2024 10:22 am Also, Germany, France, and Britain are not having riots in the streets and Britain is not under assault< The Monarchy destroyed those industries in Holland. Where do you get your news? Do you read only internet fantasies and Murdoch rags? This might interest you. Democratic rankings. Canada is #13, the USA #29 (a flawed democracy. I take no pleasure in things like that and I have been writing for decades about it in American sources. You just have this false idea of American exceptionalism that blinds you to reality. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist_Democracy_Index by Indy! on October 20, 2024 11:22 am No, Meagain - we understand our country (like all countries) is flawed. You just have a SERIOUS inferiority complex when it comes to the USA like ALL Canucks (who I know quite well from living in your countries favorite vacation spot) - and who can blame you? You're like our little pets we humor when necessary and make you hold our beer whenever it suits us. THAT'S why you're obsessed with us and we couldn't care less what an INSURANCE SALESMAN thinks about us. So far as "no riots in France"? LOL! Where the fuck have you been Mr. Stuffed Shirt Know-It-All...? View Video by Donna on October 20, 2024 11:31 am I don't know where meagain got that, either. France is famous for its street riots. by Donna on October 20, 2024 11:37 am Btw, who's the PM of the UK now? During the time of my previous carton of milk, I think it was someone different than they have now, but I could be wrong. Admittedly I lost track. by Curt_Anderson on October 20, 2024 11:44 am Keir Starmer by oldedude on October 20, 2024 12:41 pm Wrongagain: Also, Germany, France, and Britain are not having riots in the streets and Britain is not under assault< The Monarchy destroyed those industries in Holland. Where do you get your news? Do you read only internet fantasies and Murdoch rags? Energy prices, taxes, immigration: What Germany's protests are all about DW News-German opposition leader Friedrich Merz has expressed his solidarity with the farmers' protests, saying that the time is not right. However, the Christian Democrat (CDU) leader said future subsidy cuts might be necessary. "I don't promise you that things will stay that way forever with vehicle tax exemptions and diesel taxes," he said at a protest rally in the Sauerland region. "We will have to think about saving," he said. Merz sharply criticized the government's plans and stressed that certain conditions must be met before reducing the current subsidies. "This one-sided discrimination against German agriculture must come to an end," the CDU leader said. OneIndia-France: Demonstrators Across France Rally to Support Gisèle Pélicot Amidst Harrowing Sexual Violence Trial In Paris and other French cities, both women and men gathered to support Gisèle Pélicot and protest against sexual violence. This movement was sparked by the distressing trial of her ex-husband and numerous other men accused of raping her while she was drugged and unconscious. The demonstrations highlighted Pélicot's bravery in sharing her story, which has resonated with people in France and beyond. BBC-GB: Anti-racism protesters rally after week of riotsThousands of anti-racism protesters have rallied in cities and towns across England after a week of anti-immigrant rioting and disorder. Gatherings in locations where anti-immigration protests had been expected - including north London, Bristol and Newcastle - were largely peaceful, with counter-protesters chanting "refugees are welcome here" forming the bulk of the crowds. Police had been braced for further violence, with thousands of officers deployed and more than 100 events anticipated. Rioting was sparked by misinformation online that the suspect in the fatal stabbing of three little girls in Southport on 29 July was a Muslim asylum seeker. From BBC-Holland:Hay bales in flames, manure dumped on highways, blockades at supermarket distribution centres and demonstrations on politicians' doorsteps. Dutch farmers have been generating global headlines with protests described by Prime Minister Mark Rutte as "wilfully endangering others, damaging our infrastructure and threatening people who help with the clean-up". dw.com oneindia.com bbc.com bbc.com View Video by oldedude on October 20, 2024 12:44 pm Just to make life easier for folks. Key moments in this video 0:00- Introduction of Energy prices, taxes, immigration: What Germany's protests are all about | DW News 0:31- Farmers' Protests in Berlin 2:01- German Finance Minister's Speech by meagain on October 20, 2024 1:00 pm Did you read what you wrote, od? Those riots were not much more than mass protests and were protests against racists, not racist protests. And like matters. The latest in France was because of one of the worst cases of sexual abuse ever heard of. A man who drugged his wife and while she was unconscious had as many as fifty other men in to rape her. The French are quite easy in sex matters but that was a rape too far. Some of the unrest is from the 5 million Muslims who live there now and are disproportionately poor and underserved: like Blacks in America. https://www.britannica.com/study/history-of-us-riots-and-protests by meagain on October 20, 2024 1:08 pm Indy! May I remind you of past exchanges? Inferiority complex? On three occasions the USA has tried to invade Canada and has each time gone home with its collective tail between its legs. Canada made the great mistake of being too accommodating to the US in the past half century. The trade agreements cost us hundreds of thousands of manufacturing jobs and increased the number of American corporations in Canada to the detriment of Canadian business. In that sense, a Trump presidency might be good for Canada. It is estimated it will cause a hit of .9% to the GDP but that will mean that Canadian business will begin to flourish again. Short-term pain for long-term gain. by Donna on October 20, 2024 1:46 pm "On three occasions the USA has tried to invade Canada and has each time gone home with its collective tail between its legs." 212 years ago. by meagain on October 20, 2024 1:50 pm That was just the second time. The Fenians came much later. by Donna on October 20, 2024 1:53 pm Okay, 153 years ago. by Donna on October 20, 2024 2:34 pm "Her nastiness in the Bret Baier, which progressives didn't see, was apparent to everyone who's not a supporter." - Hate Brett was nasty first. Only a misogynist like yourself would think that Kamala should have just taken Brett's abuse and behaved submissively like a good little girl. This is why most women have so much contempt for tiny-dicked Trump and the tiny-dicked men who worship him like he's some god. by oldedude on October 20, 2024 3:35 pm Even in the first question, she evaded the question and drew out her answer to waste time. Baer attempted to get her back on track. She responded with “May I please finish, you have to let me finish,” Harris was snarky in that first question, using a technique she has employed against male rivals in congressional hearings and debates in the past. So she pissed in her corner first. If it's a crime to actually expect to get an answer to a question in an interview, then I guess Brett did draw first blood. She ended up (after being asked several times) never answering any of the questions. When Brett said he was under a hard break, she should have STFU. At least that would have shown some idea of professionalism. She kept talking for at least another minute which in TV time is extremely disrespectful. by Indy! on October 20, 2024 4:26 pm American voters care as much about that as they do meagain's sad attempts at impressing us with knowledge of Canada. Riots are riots, meagain - you opened the door and everybody walked thru (and over you). by oldedude on October 20, 2024 8:02 pm Donna- I will agree the first question looks like it threw her off. I'm thinking there's typically a "warm up" question, and then it gets down to it. She actually did look surprised when asked. And then there were followup questions. something none of her other "interviewers" did. Should she be defensive? Maybe. If she's been treated with kids gloves by everyone else. So I'm not saying you/her are wrong, I'm saying she got thrown in a corner very fast. wrongagain- The latest in France was because of one of the worst cases of sexual abuse ever heard of. That's bullshit. A perfect example; 10/7 to now with your butties the terrorists holding prisoners. Many of those women were raped to death. Or raped, shot, then raped again after they were dead. The women prisoners are owned by the terrorists. There is no law in Islam that requires none Muslims to be given any type of "convenance" items, such as piss pots, or more than one meal a day. Oh. And BTW, Hamas ONLY wants a ONE STATE answer. They ONLY want the country of Palestine, and any Jew that is there, will be executed. Familiarize yourself with their charter. It's a terrorist organization. And far worse than PIRA, or IRA. by HatetheSwamp on October 21, 2024 3:36 am "Brett was nasty first." How was Bret Baier nasty, in word or action? by meagain on October 21, 2024 8:18 am You are an eristic misologist, od, and you need to broaden your reading. The riot in France is about what I said it is. And indy, you are just a flag waving, hand on heart believer. "My country right or wrong." by Indy! on October 21, 2024 9:37 am And indy, you are just a flag waving, hand on heart believer. "My country right or wrong." Comical. Just shows how little you know about me. I do believe the USA is always right when it comes to anything having to do with Canada. Of course that's a given. 😌 by oldedude on October 21, 2024 9:50 am wrongagain- I wasn't disagreeing with you. So you might want to actually read posts before you condemn them. The only part I was disagreeing with was 10/7, which I know you don't consider a crime. Or even morally wrong. by Indy! on October 21, 2024 9:54 am If we were to compare the Israeli/Hamas situation to the U.S. Revolutionary War - which side would be the British and which side would be the Americans, OD? 🤔 Go To Top

Find old posts & articles

Show Most Recent Articles Articles by category: Politics+ Religion+ Law & Crime Military News Media History Health Sports+ Humor Entertainment Misc.

Report spam & abuse SelectSmart.com home page