Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Turley: The "haymaker" in Supreme Court arguments. Chief Justice Roberts. "Openly mocking of DC Circuit."
Law by HatetheSwamp     April 26, 2024 5:59 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [124 views]


pb's Legal Goobers #s 2 & 3: The NY v Trump case is collapsing
Law by HatetheSwamp     April 26, 2024 3:43 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [26 views]


The Oval Office Oaf calls for "Four more years. Pause."
Entertainment by HatetheSwamp     April 24, 2024 2:56 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (4 comments) [75 views]


Republicans: Do you know where your political donations are?
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 6:12 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (7 comments) [323 views]


The latest general election polls from this weekend reveal something interesting.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 22, 2024 11:03 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (10 comments) [423 views]


So Ukraine got money.
Military by oldedude     April 24, 2024 3:58 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [89 views]


Donna may be getting her wish granted: Gateway Pundit to file for bankruptcy
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:28 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [31 views]


James Comer hopes for divine intervention to save him from embarrassing impeachment fiasco.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:05 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (2 comments) [77 views]


Trump, Giuliani, Meadows are unindicted co-conspirators in Michigan fake elector case, hearing reveals
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 4:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (3 comments) [38 views]


Russia is even more furious over vote by Congress to support Ukraine than MTG.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (11 comments) [640 views]


Dungeons & Dragons selectors, pages, etc.
Supreme Court Gets Jan 6. Defendant Out of Jail
By oldedude
March 27, 2024 8:55 pm
Category: Dungeons & Dragons

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

This comes down to over-sentencing for misdemeanor charges on J6. dims are going to have issues in "catch and release" murder suspects in NYC, DC, Chicago, LA, etc, while keeping misdemeanor charges in jail that have no criminal history, nor any reason to jump bail.

A man convicted of charges related to the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol is getting out of jail early due to the Supreme Court taking up a case that may affect the sentences of hundreds of defendants.

Kevin Seefried, a man from Laurel, Delaware, was sentenced to three years in prison for a felony conviction of obstruction of an official proceeding, as well as 12 months and six months for misdemeanor charges. The Department of Justice said that Seefried, as well as his son Hunter, were among the first to enter the Capitol and were photographed carrying a Confederate flag while inside.

That obstruction charge is at the center of a case picked up by the Supreme Court.

That case, Fischer v. United States, challenges the DOJ's use of the "obstruction of an official proceeding" charge, which has been used against January 6 defendants for allegedly disrupting the Electoral College certification. After the Supreme Court agreed to hear arguments in the case, some defendants filed for release pending the final ruling.

According to court documents, McFadden determined that Seefried does not pose a flight risk or a danger to his community and that his appeal was not "for the purpose of delay and raises a substantial question" that is likely to result in a reversal, new trial, a noncustodial sentence, or a custodial sentence that will have ended by the time the appeal is decided.

He noted that at least four Supreme Court justices are interested in taking up the challenge to the DOJ's obstruction charge use and that if the court rules In Fischer's favor, "it will almost certainly mean that Seefried's analogous conduct" did not violate the obstruction law.

"In that case, Seefried will be left serving only his sentences for the four misdemeanor convictions. But, by the time his appeal has concluded, those custodial sentences will have likely concluded," he wrote.


Cited and related links:

  1. msn.com



Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Supreme Court Gets Jan 6. Defendant Out of Jail":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on March 28, 2024 3:39 am

    Yeah.

    Trump's right about this. Lots of J6 overcharging by Biden DOJ. Lawfare against mommies and daddies and nannas and pappaps with no criminal background.

    What our SS progressives have no idea about is how conservative nonMAGA is roiled over the injustice. They believe the Liz Cheney Show Trial was truth.
    Tens of millions know it ain't...

    ...one reason Trump has locked up nonMAGA support to the degree he has is that people who aren't willingly propagandized by po's metaphorical Rachel and Curt's Holy Trinity know.


  2. by Indy! on March 28, 2024 10:08 am

    Great news! So I guess all those folks George W. Smirk locked up in Gitmo for no reason will be the next group the Supreme Clowns release.


  3. by Curt_Anderson on March 28, 2024 10:42 am
    From what I gleaned from OD's cited article and elsewhere, Kevin Seefried may have his sentence reduced, but it's not a done deal. It seems the Supreme Court expressed interest but hasn't reached a decision.
    washingtonexaminer.com


  4. by oldedude on March 28, 2024 11:01 am
    And it wasn't just the over-charging. It was how the government set up the convictions. Unlike terrorism law (felonies) these misdemeanor crimes were given concurrent sentencing, which violates the guidelines. Again, a very good example of selective enforcement and prosecution.


    “We must apply the Guideline as written, and Brock’s interference with one stage of the electoral college vote-counting process — while no doubt endangering our democratic processes and temporarily derailing Congress’s constitutional work — did not interfere with the ‘administration of justice,’” said the ruling, written by Judge Patricia A. Millett.

    Brock had been convicted of six charges, including “corruptly obstructing Congress’s certification of the electoral count.” Former President Donald Trump also faces a charge alleging that he obstructed an official proceeding. He has pleaded not guilty.


    A concurrent sentence refers to a type of sentence judges are able to give defendants convicted of more than one crime. Instead of serving each sentence one after another, a concurrent sentence allows the defendant to serve all of their sentences at the same time, where the longest period of time is controlling. Concurrent sentences are usually done in misdemeanor cases.

    A consecutive sentence, or cumulative sentence, is one which does not begin to run until the expiration of a prior sentence. Unlike concurrent sentences, which are served simultaneously, consecutive sentences follow one another and adds (as opposed to combine) to the duration of one's sentence.
    nbcnews.com
    law.cornell.edu


Go To Top

Comment on: "Supreme Court Gets Jan 6. Defendant Out of Jail"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page