By HatetheSwamp February 13, 2024 3:20 am Category: Crime (0.0 from 0 votes) Rules of the Post Write A New Article How To Post Here Rate this article (5=best, 0=poor)

A source familiar with the planning first told Fox News Digital that Bobulinski will appear on Tuesday, Feb. 13, at 10 a.m. for a transcribed interview before both the House Oversight and Judiciary Committees.

The testimony could last eight hours, according to the source.

Bobulinski, in December, demanded Biden "stop lying" about that meeting and called on him to "correct the record."

"Why is Joe Biden blatantly lying to the American people and the world by claiming that he did not meet with me face to face?" Bobulinski told Fox News Digital in a statement. "He should call his son Hunter and brother Jim as they can remind him of the facts. The American people deserve the truth!"

Despite Biden’s recent denials of involvement with his son’s business dealings, text messages dating back to May 2017 reveal that Biden met with Bobulinski months after he left the vice president's office. Fox News Digital first reported on the text messages and that meeting in October 2020.

"Mrng plse let me knw if we will do early dinner w your Uncle & dad and where, also for document translation do you want it simple Chinese or traditional?" Bobulinski texted Hunter Biden on May 2, 2017.

Hunter replied: "Dad not in now until 11 – let’s me I and Jim meet at 10 at Beverly Hilton where he’s staying."

Bobulinski has repeatedly said "the big guy" was Joe Biden. IRS whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, who claimed that politics had influenced the years-long federal investigation into Hunter Biden, also said "the big guy" was known to be Joe Biden.

Cited and related links:

1. foxnews.com

Comments Start Below

by Indy! on February 13, 2024 6:56 am I swore that was another of your Babylon Bee stories until I got to the source at the end. by Curt_Anderson on February 13, 2024 9:02 am HtS, So when does James Comer-Pyle and Gym Jordan arrest Joe Biden? by HatetheSwamp on February 13, 2024 10:29 am Arrest? I've said from the beginning that they just want to tell the truth about "that feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap" and wait until November. by Curt_Anderson on February 13, 2024 10:43 am I noticed Tony Bobinski’s testimony will be in the form of a “transcribed interview”. Not live? Not even videotaped? It seems that the Republicans in charge are making sure that no embarrassing excerpts are released to the public. by HatetheSwamp on February 13, 2024 11:15 am Aren't Dems going to be present? by Curt_Anderson on February 13, 2024 11:24 am So? Will the Democrats be allowed to videotape the proceedings? by HatetheSwamp on February 13, 2024 11:40 am Isn't this SOP? Later on, won't there be one of those public hearings where House members on both sides talk over the witness(es) and each other and shout, "will the member yield?" every other minute? by Curt_Anderson on February 13, 2024 11:45 am It may be SOP for the GOP. Normally congressional committees interview in public, like the J6 committee. by HatetheSwamp on February 13, 2024 12:00 pm You've got to be kidding. In what way was the J6 Committee typical? by Curt_Anderson on February 13, 2024 12:03 pm It was public. by HatetheSwamp on February 13, 2024 12:05 pm Some of it was. There were depositions...lots of em. by Curt_Anderson on February 13, 2024 12:10 pm It was at the request of the witnesses, not the committee that some of the January 6 testimony was behind closed doors. And what was not public was videotaped. It’s just odd that the Republicans are doing only a “transcribed interview”. by HatetheSwamp on February 13, 2024 12:14 pm Horsepucky. by Curt_Anderson on February 13, 2024 12:14 pm Republicans Finally Talked To The 1 Biden Impeachment Witness Who Agrees With Them yahoo.com by HatetheSwamp on February 13, 2024 3:28 pm HuffPo by Curt_Anderson on February 13, 2024 3:43 pm Curated by Yahoo. by Curt_Anderson on February 13, 2024 5:04 pm Republicans believe Tony Bobulinski's interview on Hunter Biden Evidence? We don't need no stinkin' evidence! foxnews.com by HatetheSwamp on February 13, 2024 9:59 pm No evidence in an "opening statement?" No problem. by Curt_Anderson on February 13, 2024 10:31 pm I was referring to his entire interview today. Just to be clear, it was Bobulinski who suggested 10% for "the Big Guy", a suggestion that wasn't taken seriously. Now that a Democrat just won George Santos' old seat, the GOP pipe dream of impeaching Biden just became even more elusive. (CNN)A former Biden family business associate levied critical but unproven allegations against President Joe Biden in a closed-door House interview Tuesday, resurrecting claims he has lobbed since 2020. (Forbes)Bobulinski’s claims have never been corroborated, and at least eight other business partners, including business partners James Gilliar and Devon Archer, consultant Mervyn Yan and art gallery owner Georges Bergès, all testified to the House committee that President Biden had no involvement in Hunter’s deals, any connection to loans or payments, or even discussed his son’s businesses with them, according to transcripts obtained by CNN. (ABC News)While working on the prospective Chinese joint venture, Bobulinski penned an email proposing a 10% cut for the "the big guy," a reference he said referred to Joe Biden, which Republicans have cited as evidence of the president's involvement in his son's overseas work. Others who were involved in those dealings have derided Bobulinski's proposition as "wishful" thinking, "ridiculous," and not serious, with Rob Walker, another onetime associate of Hunter Biden's, testifying that nobody responded to Bobulinski's email after he sent it. cnn.com forbes.com abcnews.go.com by HatetheSwamp on February 14, 2024 4:26 am C'mon, Curt. Are you being serious!!!!!? How many people knew what took place between Michael Corleone!!!!!? It's established, through documents that contain the handwriting of "that feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap" that Joe lied about knowing Hunter's business associates. And, there are those two canceled checks that comport with 10% of recent business deals. I think that you're being unnecessarily credulous. Still, as Sean Hannity quotes Jesus: "Let not your heart to troubled." pb's been right about this from the beginning. The Impeachment Inquiry is as far as it goes... except for campaign ads. Joe will not be impeached. It'll go no further than publicizing his lies... while he still had enuff brain to lie. by HatetheSwamp on February 14, 2024 4:36 am Re: "How many people knew what took place between Michael Corleone!!!!!?" ...and Don Vito... by Curt_Anderson on February 14, 2024 9:25 am Um, HtS, that was also the fictitious case. by HatetheSwamp on February 14, 2024 9:49 am So, if what evidence suggests may have taken place in the Biden Crime Family actually is the reality, you're suggesting that Joe, Hunter and Jim would do their dirtiest deed openly for anyone and everyone to see? Don't think so. by HatetheSwamp on February 14, 2024 10:13 am Tony Bobulinski: Joe "enabled" Hunter's business dealings... made $Millions. View Video by Curt_Anderson on February 14, 2024 10:17 am As I have said before, you are a gullible rube. Let’s take the canceled checks you just mentioned. There is no evidence to support any claims that those checks were anything but what they were labeled as, namely, short term, no interest loan repayments. By the way, if that money paid to Joe Biden really was for nefarious reasons, why not use cash instead of a check, which could be possibly incriminating? As the Trump family has amply illustrated, doing business with foreigners is not a crime. What might be a crime when politician and money is involved is bribery. If there was a quid pro quo, it would be obvious and easy to identify. There would be some blatant example that Joe Biden influenced of a policy decision or a construction project that benefited a foreign entity. The Republicans have not made that case. cnn.com factcheck.org by HatetheSwamp on February 14, 2024 10:53 am Comer, Jordan, Smith: Bobulinski testimony was explosive. Wait until you can read the transcript. View Video by HatetheSwamp on February 14, 2024 11:04 am Let’s take the canceled checks you just mentioned. There is no evidence to support any claims that those checks were anything but what they were labeled as, namely, short term, no interest loan repayments. Bull$#!t. It's powerful circumstantial evidence. If you're aware of any member of the Crime Family documenting the details of the loans, please enlighten ol pb. The right-wing media ain't sayin. As far as I know, your Holy Trinity ain't either. What might be a crime when politician and money is involved is bribery. Two things: 1. Watch the video. The boys address that. And,... and this is the real kneeslapper for ol pb... 2. Have you noticed how "that feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap's" really going to the mat to get that $60,000,000,000 to Ukraine... AND the most credible evidence of Joe being bribed is over that Burisma kerfuffle. Smoke and fire, baby! Right before your eyes! by HatetheSwamp on February 14, 2024 11:05 am Video View Video by Curt_Anderson on February 14, 2024 11:08 am Will it be as “explosive” as the bit you quoted above? Since when is enabling a crime? If a parent enabling their children is a crime, then Donald Trump, Henry Fonda, Prescott Bush, George Bush, Mike Wallace, Tom Hanks, myself and most other parents are all guilty. by HatetheSwamp on February 14, 2024 11:20 am The question is, to what end? When "that feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap" had a brain, he was a typically corrupt Swamp politician. Why do you insist on arguing that he's Mother Theresa in drag? There's a mountain of circumstantial evidence that Joe's done America dirty. There's direct evidence that he's lied about Biden Crime Family business dealings. And, the GOPs ain't publishing the dirt. by Curt_Anderson on February 14, 2024 11:30 am "And, the GOPs ain't publishing the dirt." ---HtS The reason being is that there isn't any dirt to publicize. Much insinuation, but no evidence. The House GOP is lot like you: they got nothing. You say bribery was addressed then you tell me to watch the video but you won't give an example of the alleged bribery. We are supposed to take your word for it that there is "powerful circumstantial evidence" and that we need to "wait for the transcript". Why is there a wait? Are the Republicans transcribing the interview with a quill pen and ink? by HatetheSwamp on February 14, 2024 12:17 pm The reason being is that there isn't any dirt to publicize. Speaking for all of SS... and every American, for that matter,... we all wish we were as connected and enlightened as are yourself, baha. by Curt_Anderson on February 14, 2024 12:23 pm Me too. But alas! by HatetheSwamp on February 14, 2024 12:31 pm If you'd just tell us your secret, man... by Curt_Anderson on February 14, 2024 2:21 pm HtS, You probably don't want a serious answer, but my "secret" is to not start with a preconceived notion and then try to make insinuations, innuendoes and conspiracy theories support that notion. Add to that Occam's Razor and a well-tuned BS-meter. by HatetheSwamp on February 18, 2024 2:58 am And, it was directed toward you specifically because you have made light of the legitimacy of the Bobulinski emails and his testimony. And, and why should ol pb be surprised?, in spite of his damaging testimony, you're still Good Germaning him. by HatetheSwamp on February 18, 2024 4:33 am Wrong thread Go To Top

Find old posts & articles

Show Most Recent Articles Articles by category: Politics+ Religion+ Law & Crime Military News Media History Health Sports+ Humor Entertainment Misc.

Report spam & abuse SelectSmart.com home page