Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Turley: The "haymaker" in Supreme Court arguments. Chief Justice Roberts. "Openly mocking of DC Circuit."
Law by HatetheSwamp     April 26, 2024 5:59 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (7 comments) [177 views]


pb's Legal Goobers #s 2 & 3: The NY v Trump case is collapsing
Law by HatetheSwamp     April 26, 2024 3:43 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [26 views]


The Oval Office Oaf calls for "Four more years. Pause."
Entertainment by HatetheSwamp     April 24, 2024 2:56 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (4 comments) [82 views]


Republicans: Do you know where your political donations are?
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 6:12 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (7 comments) [345 views]


The latest general election polls from this weekend reveal something interesting.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 22, 2024 11:03 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (10 comments) [423 views]


So Ukraine got money.
Military by oldedude     April 24, 2024 3:58 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [92 views]


Donna may be getting her wish granted: Gateway Pundit to file for bankruptcy
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:28 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [37 views]


James Comer hopes for divine intervention to save him from embarrassing impeachment fiasco.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:05 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (2 comments) [81 views]


Trump, Giuliani, Meadows are unindicted co-conspirators in Michigan fake elector case, hearing reveals
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 4:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (3 comments) [42 views]


Russia is even more furious over vote by Congress to support Ukraine than MTG.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 21, 2024 6:09 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (11 comments) [641 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Court Denies Trump’s Presidential Immunity Appeal In E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case
By Curt_Anderson
December 13, 2023 12:11 pm
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

(Forbes)A federal appeals court rejected former President Donald Trump’s claim he was protected from liability in a defamation lawsuit from writer E. Jean Carroll—who accused Trump of rape—because of presidential immunity, the latest legal blow to the former president and 2024 hopeful.


Cited and related links:

  1. forbes.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Court Denies Trump’s Presidential Immunity Appeal In E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on December 13, 2023 12:15 pm

    Has she figured out yet in what year the rape took place? Baha


  2. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 12:29 pm
    She has it down to within a few months, basically wintertime. She stated that Donald Trump had sexually assaulted her in late 1995 or early 1996 in the Bergdorf Goodman department store in New York City.

    Trump isn't attempting the defend his defamatory remarks with any sort of affirmative defense. He argued unsuccessfully that presidential immunity protects him from lawsuits.


    en.wikipedia.org


  3. by HatetheSwamp on December 13, 2023 12:41 pm

    So, Trump has no way of proving he was in another place at the time she claims she was raped.


  4. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 12:58 pm
    HtS,
    So unless every altar boy and choir member can nail down the exact time and date of their rape, you'd let every pedophile priest go free?




  5. by HatetheSwamp on December 13, 2023 1:02 pm

    Oy, no.

    I've said, from the beginning, that her case is extremely weak. And, if it had not been made in New York, ol E. Jean would have had great difficulty in getting a judgment.

    I'm right.


  6. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 1:38 pm
    HtS,
    Trump could have presented evidence that he was out of town during some or all of the period he allegedly raped her. He didn’t. That she couldn’t nail down the date is point in favor of the defense.

    That other women testified Trump assaulted them helped the plaintiff’s case. That Trump said Carroll is “not his type” then mistook her for his ex-wife helped the plaintiff.

    To win a civil case, a plaintiff must convince the jury by “a preponderance of the evidence.” Simply said, a plaintiff must prove that there is a greater likelihood than not that the defendant did something wrong.

    Do you really think it is unlikely that the pussy grabber forced himself on her?


  7. by oldedude on December 13, 2023 6:52 pm
    HtS,
    Trump could have presented evidence that he was out of town during some or all of the period he allegedly raped her.

    How was he supposed to do that without a timeline? That doesn't make sense. If I don't have a year (even in my boring life) I could have been in Germany, Panama, Costa Rica, Guatamala, Nepal, India, Thailand, Japan, ROK, Saudi, Kuwait, UAE, Somewhere undisclosed in either the Pacific, Atlantic, or Indian Ocean, Qatar, Afghanistan, Iraq, or Iraq, Afghanistan, or Oman. and those aren't even the places I went on leave. That's another, say dozen, dozen and a half countries? And I'm not trumpster with my own jet.


  8. by Curt_Anderson on December 13, 2023 9:18 pm
    OD,
    The case wasn't a rape case; it was a defamation case. As with any case, it is the jury's job to evaluate the credibility of the witnesses. Trump did not impress them as being very credible.

    Trump denied that he had ever met Carroll, accused her of "totally lying" and that "she's not my type."

    Here is where Trump shoots himself in the foot: Trump was shown this photograph, he mistakenly identified E. Jean Carroll as his second wife, Marla Maples, despite his first wife Ivana Trump also being in the picture; upon recognizing his mistake, he protested that the photo was "very blurry" (the photo is not blurry).


  9. by HatetheSwamp on December 14, 2023 4:45 am

    Exactly, OD. And, I have noted repeatedly, Alan Dershowitz is confident that, for all practical purposes, this will be set aside.

    The TrumpHate theory was that these civil judgments would hurt Trump with moderate and independent voters. Curiously, it seems to have helped.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Court Denies Trump’s Presidential Immunity Appeal In E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page