Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

If Artificial Intelligence is so smart, why can't it count or spell properly?
Computers by Curt_Anderson     March 28, 2025 3:20 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [35 views]


Surrendering to Authoritarianism
Education by Donna     March 24, 2025 4:39 pm (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (9 comments) [116 views]


Which lib journalist is the biggest hack? The RUTHLESS "Hack Madness 2025"
Journalism by HatetheSwamp     March 22, 2025 4:02 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (8 comments) [117 views]


Jeffrey Goldberg was the wrong JG on the war plans group chat. Here is who I think Waltz intended.
Government by Curt_Anderson     March 28, 2025 10:47 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [48 views]


What do the men and women of our military think about Team Trump sharing military secrets?
Military by Curt_Anderson     March 28, 2025 10:31 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [23 views]


My prediction and a question about Usha Vance's visit to Greenland.
International by Curt_Anderson     March 24, 2025 9:06 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (12 comments) [170 views]


Trump Leaves Presidency To Become Even More Powerful District Court Judge
Government by HatetheSwamp     March 28, 2025 9:56 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [10 views]


Inflation, the economy generally is getting worse. Thanks for nothing Trump voters.
Business by Curt_Anderson     March 28, 2025 9:24 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (3 comments) [28 views]


Around 23,000 Tucsonans Show Up for Bernie and AOC's FIGHT OLIGARCHY Tour
President by Ponderer     March 23, 2025 7:39 am (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (30 comments) [308 views]


Hegseth Kicking Himself For Not Just Getting 13 Soldiers Killed And Giving $80 Billion In Weapons To Terrorists
Military by HatetheSwamp     March 28, 2025 3:18 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [23 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Spicer v Biden
By HatetheSwamp
February 18, 2025 10:45 am
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


I know. We all revere the musings of our own SS former Supreme Court clerk and Ivy League law school professor who has declared everything Trump's doing as UNCONSTITUTIONAL. But,...

Gang,

It's a court case that that "dithering and diminished" "feckless dementia-ridden" Doddering Old Fool won when he was sued for replacing Trump appointees to the Board of Visitors for the Naval Academy that proves that the President can fire at will:

"a presidential appointee in a similar position was removable at will by the President."

Canyadigit!!!!!?


Cited and related links:

  1. aflegal.org

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Spicer v Biden ":

  1. by Indy! on February 18, 2025 11:10 am

    You DO understand Biden is no longer president - right, MAGAt?


  2. by HatetheSwamp on February 18, 2025 11:32 am

    I do.

    But, the court's decision had nuthin to do with the Doddering Old Fool. It had to do with the separation of powers. Every president is the head of the Executive Branch.


  3. by Indy! on February 18, 2025 12:34 pm

    This board is turning into an elementary school...

    Meagain just found out about the European Union 30 years later...

    Brown Shorts just found out the president is the head of the Executive Branch...

    🙄


  4. by meagain on February 18, 2025 12:36 pm
    Actually, indy, I just found out that you are a bigger idiot than I had thought. I responded to your silly screenshot and carefully explained the EU to you.


  5. by Indy! on February 18, 2025 3:07 pm

    Yes, now you want to try to explain Miranda again? 😂

    Word to the ignorant, Meagain - I have never learned a single thing from you that I didn't already know. What did you think Zelensky was talking about when he said Europe should build an army? Which COUNTRY did you think that was? Or did you think he was referring to the CONTINENT? Because the rest of us understood he was talking about the EU before you chimed in like a fucking idiot and tried to "explain" something we all understood.


  6. by meagain on February 19, 2025 7:54 am
    Lord, Indy! But you are dense. The caution, (Miranda to you) Became entrenched in law in England in 1883 and codified in 1994, It was in practice long before 1883 but had not been enacted into law. Miranda copied. I have been through this with you several times but the lead shield on your head seems to prevent it from getting through.

    As for the rest of your post, I have no idea what you are talking about. You do need to learn, though, that the EU is not a continent. The EU is 27 out of 44 countries and more than 200 million Europeans are not in the EU.


  7. by HatetheSwamp on February 19, 2025 8:15 am

    meagain,

    I think all of us wish we knew everything as you do... except for isle. He UNDERSTANDS even more than everything.


  8. by oldedude on February 19, 2025 8:24 am
    In indy's infinite "knowledge" of the basics is what is called "precedence"😱, meaning that pedojoe said it was okay to do that. US law says that pedojoe articulated the reasons it was legal, the courts bought off on it. BINGO! It's okay to do! What a friggin' concept! If it's good for one, and the courts ruled on it, you'd have to "argue" that you were a POS and WRONG!🤣🤣

    THAT is information that should have been covered in high school "civics" ASSuming he actually went to an accredited district to go to school.

    And he'll whine, "I know more than you😢, really i do..." OBVIOUSLY NOT!!!


    Honestly, this is a real issue at this time in our history. The dims did so much "stuff" regarding manipulating the law, that now, trumpster has the run of pretty much anything he wants. That's bad for the dims.

    One issue that trumpster will have if he so chooses, is the lawfare issue with DOJ. I am going to have to hold trumpster to the same standard I held pedojoe to. So "if" the dims can show the courts they illegally violated the 4th and 6th Amendments (a legal standard, not the dim doublestandard) in court, there's a lot of latitude trumpster has in creating cases that maybe "shouldn't" exist.


  9. by oldedude on February 19, 2025 8:38 am
    I don't understand how the Miranda ruling got into this... other than indy used it as an "example."

    Second thing. How common law had this since the dawn of time during the stone age is irrelevant to the discussion. It makes ZERO DIFFERENCE in our courts, as has been shown in our courts.

    People (mostly on the left) have tried to use laws of other countries as examples of what we "should" do. Our courts don't care. If you want a law changed to the same thing that common law says, there are methods to do that. All of them go through congress.

    The facts are that the self-absorbed euros that want our system to change to theirs have never lived her and quite honestly, have ZERO say over our laws. Kind of the same thing meagain, as the US saying that canada is nothing more than a northern extension. I would consider that to be extremely rude and insulting. Canada has it's own history etc with how it's moving along. Same thing with Greenland.

    I also don't compare the other FYVEs laws with ours, other than comparing our 2nd amendment rights, with the lack of rights in those countries.


  10. by Indy! on February 19, 2025 8:47 am

    Miranda, that wasn't the argument over Miranda. But you trying to change it to something else only proves my point - that you didn't know it until I explained it to you.

    OD? Stick to what you know, please.


  11. by meagain on February 19, 2025 8:56 am
    You are a weasel, indy. There can be no other argument about Miranda.


  12. by meagain on February 19, 2025 9:01 am
    Miranda came into it, OD, because it is a constant with indy. He brings it you frequently. Many years ago when he claimed it to be unique to the US in an insulting post. I corrected him then but he still makes the same false charge without reason.

    WRT to your post, the Euros don't want to change your system to theirs. They don't care what your system is. They do pity you for being stuck with a failing system, though. One that produces a barbaric social context.

    Also, they all have a superior rights code to the Merican. One that conforms closely to that of the United Nations: that like the English recognises that your second amendment is something that all Europe followed England years ago in abolishing. It was something that England had since the early Middle Ages but became redundant in the early 17th. century and abolished in the early nineteenth.


  13. by Indy! on February 19, 2025 9:03 am

    by meagain on February 19, 2025 8:56 am
    You are a weasel, indy. There can be no other argument about Miranda.


    ROFLMFAO!!!! MORE PROOF you STILL don't get it. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    That's okay. Miranda - it's not the first time you made yourself look like an idiot.


  14. by Indy! on February 19, 2025 9:05 am

    Oh, and Miranda? I never once claimed...

    "Many years ago when he claimed it to be unique to the US in an insulting post."

    So now you're lying about it too. Another sure sign you got your ass kicked back then. And now. 😂


  15. by HatetheSwamp on February 19, 2025 9:26 am

    You're right on this Indy, but have you noticed that you've alienate half of the SS crowd?


  16. by Indy! on February 19, 2025 9:36 am

    Why no... I hadn't noticed. 🤔


  17. by oldedude on February 19, 2025 10:47 am
    no doubt...


  18. by meagain on February 19, 2025 12:03 pm
    You are no longer amusing, indy, but a wretched liar.


  19. by Indy! on February 19, 2025 3:56 pm

    Fuck off, Miranda. The only reason you're on this board is because it gives you an outlet to call Americans stupid. It might work if you weren't one-upped by even the dumbass MAGAts. 🙄


Go To Top

Comment on: "Spicer v Biden "


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. © 1999 - 2025 Selectsmart®.com - Do not copy without written permission. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page