by Hunter28 on June 25, 2023 11:49 pm
Indy! wrote:
You have no idea how close I follow politics, but judging from your comically obtuse posts - it's definitely far more than you do.
Just because you follow politics doesn’t mean you understand it. We do not live in a dictatorship. We live in a democratic republic, where elections are won and legislation is passed by assembling coalitions and compromising with political opponents. Biden has accomplished an awful lot for someone who was dealt a pretty lousy hand.
You said your political superhero is Bernie Sanders. He’s the guy you think could have defeated Trump and gotten more accomplished than President Biden.
You said that Bernie matched up better than Biden in head-to-head polls against Trump. That was incorrect, and I provided the evidence.
You mentioned that any Democrat could have defeated Trump. That was obviously not the case for Hillary. The reason Jim Clyburn backed Biden is because he felt Biden had the best chance of beating Trump in the general election. Clyburn has a lot more experience than you in politics, so I trust his judgment more than yours. He clearly observed strengths and skills in Biden that you overlooked.
Moreover, American voters don’t have a history of supporting left-wing Democrats for president. McGovern lost 49 states in 1972 and Mondale lost 49 states in 1984. It’s doubtful that Bernie, the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate, could have assembled a winning coalition in the presidential election. Biden, always seen as a moderate, could deflect accusations of socialism by pointing at his track record. Sanders was a socialist. It’s doubtful Bernie would have been able to attract the white middle-class suburban voters who were key to winning most of the swing states.
As Curt Anderson pointed out, Sanders is from a state that had a Republican governor, who would have likely appointed a Republican as his replacement. Sanders would not have been able to secure a Democratic majority in the Senate – even if Warnock and Osoff had won – so there is very little legislation he could have passed.
Biden did not campaign on a progressive agenda, but he moved in that direction after he was elected. Although he had a 50-50 Senate and a slim House majority, he helped pass important legislation that advanced Democratic and progressive priorities. I have trouble imagining any Democrat who could have achieved more under the circumstances.
You have not provided any credible argument that Bernie or anyone else could have done better.
You're NOT upset you got promised 42.8% more and Biden screwed you out of it FOR NO REASON AT ALL?
What an odd and irrational thing to say. First, as Curt Anderson pointed out, the $1,400 Biden delivered after the inauguration was in addition to an earlier payment of $600. Even if you want to argue that he should have provided a full additional $2,000, Biden didn't screw me or anyone else out of the money. It's a Democratic system, and he did the best he could under the circumstances.
Moreover, Biden provided a child tax credit of $3,000 to $3,600 to most working families. Even if you want to quibble about whether Biden delivered $1,400 or the full $2,000, his administration found other ways to support struggling families.
by Indy! on June 26, 2023 9:58 am
You said your political superhero is Bernie Sanders. He’s the guy you think could have defeated Trump and gotten more accomplished than President Biden.
You're just outright lying now. I never said any such thing. I preferred Sanders over Biden - yes. Every PROGRESSIVE on the planet did - he was popular in other countries as well as the USA. He provided hope for ending the insanity of the corruption going on in this country and the world. He was not my "hero" - only tools like yourself consider politicians "heroes". They're CRIMINALS.
I'm done rehashing the 2020 D election theft. All the information is out there - learn something. I'm tired of educating you.
What an odd and irrational thing to say. First, as Curt Anderson pointed out, the $1,400 Biden delivered after the inauguration was in addition to an earlier payment of $600.
I blew this stupid D talking point out of the water in two separate threads already. Below you will find the link to an article explaining why both you and Curt are wrong including a graphic of the pertinent points highlighted for Curt's convenience and now yours. Go down to the end and you'll see even ELECTED DEMOCRATS were saying "$1400 is not $2000!" 🙄
|
|
en.as.com