Comments posted organically
Don't pester me for political donations when you refuse $2700 and less from billionaires!

By Curt Anderson
February 15, 2020 12:51 pm
Category: Opinion

(5.0 from 1 vote)

Rules of the Post
Rate this article
(5=best, 0=poor)
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars

There is a simple formula to achieve business success: offer something for which people are willing to give you a lot of money. It can be anything that people are willing to pay for. That something can be automobiles which is how Henry Ford became rich. It can be a series of fantasy book which is how J. K. Rowling became rich. That something can even be political ideas which is how Bernie Sanders became a millionaire selling his book "Our Revolution". As a presidential candidate, Sanders exhibits his prowess as a political campaign fund-raiser. Sanders raised in $108 million so far in the current Democratic primary contest.

Politics is a business. By any financial measure, Bernie Sanders is very, very successful. His success goes beyond the money raised which he has declared in FEC filings as the Associated Press reported:

WASHINGTON (AP) Bernie Sanders says he doesn't want a super PAC. Instead, he has Our Revolution, a nonprofit political organization he founded that functions much the same as one.

Like a super PAC, which is shorthand for super political action committee, Our Revolution can raise unlimited sums from wealthy patrons that dwarf the limits faced by candidates and conventional PACs. Unlike a super PAC, however, the group doesn't have to disclose its donors a stream of revenue commonly referred to as "dark money."

Now, with less than one month to go before the Iowa caucuses, Our Revolution appears to be skirting campaign finance law, which forbids groups founded by federal candidates and officeholders from using large donations to finance federal election activity, including Sanders' 2020 bid.

In the 2016 primary election, Sander's catchphrase was "millionaires and billionaires". He accused millionaires and billionaires of corrupting the U.S. political system.

In his current campaign for the 2020 presidential election Sanders still excoriates billionaires, but he has stopped mentioning millionaires. In the eight 2020 Democratic debates he has not uttered "millionaires" once. He apparently is more sympathetic to millionaires now that he is one.

Sanders leaves no doubt that he thinks billionaires are bad people and their money is tainted. Sanders makes it clear that you should think so too. Sanders is such a purist when it comes to billionaires that he won't accept any political donations from billionaires, even though the maximum amount that they can donate to Sanders or to any political candidate is $2700 in an election cycle.

When Marta Thoma Hall, who is married to billionaire David Hall, gave $470 to the Bernie Sanders campaign, the Sanders campaign sent her money back. Bernie Sanders apparently believes he is incorruptible, so it's not clear to me why Ms. Hall's $470 would suddenly send him down a path of corruption.

I am not a billionaire, although it is not because of a personal animosity toward billionaires or an aversion to having a billion dollars. I don't even know any billionaires. However, I believe that there are good billionaires and bad billionaires just as there are good and bad people in every economic strata.

When a politician who says they won't be taking money from billionaires but try to guilt trip me into making a donation, my thought is damn, you turned down their $470 or $2700 donation and now you want me, with my modest income, to fork over my hard-earned cash to you?

Incidentally, why am I supposed to be mad at a self-funded billionaire candidate if I happen to agree with them on the political issues important to me?

Surely there are worse people than people than billionaires to hold in contempt. If a candidate is going to refuse money from a certain class of people, why not refuse political donations from child molesters, animal abusers or murderers?

I'd like to hear a politician announce that they won't be accepting any donations from people who earn less than the US poverty level which is $12,000 annually per individual or $25,000 for a family of four. After all, people who are struggling to make ends meet should spend their money on the essentials. They can show their support by voting. It is one vote per registered voter regardless of income.

Cited and related links:


Comments Start Below

The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Don't pester me for political donations when you refuse $2700 and less from billionaires!":

Be the first to comment on this article.

Comment on: "Don't pester me for political donations when you refuse $2700 and less from billionaires!"

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact | Advertise on | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:
Report spam & abuse home page

From our contributors:
Display Order:

Senate Republicans managed to score points for their side today.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     August 7, 2022 10:53 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: (0 comments) [15 views]

How the Dems may benefit, short-term, because the GOP is the new home of openness and inclusion
Politics by HatetheSwamp     August 6, 2022 7:08 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: Donna (14 comments) [135 views]

White nationalist PM of Hungary Viktor Orban received a standing ovation after his speech at CPAC yesterday
Dinosaurs by Donna     August 5, 2022 10:20 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: Donna (45 comments) [379 views]

UAW is going GOP
Science Fiction by oldedude     August 7, 2022 2:30 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: Donna (6 comments) [65 views]

For those who want to know
Politics by islander     August 7, 2022 3:48 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: oldedude (11 comments) [159 views]

ABC: Joe's polls still suck
President by HatetheSwamp     August 7, 2022 6:28 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: oldedude (2 comments) [22 views]

Even 'Frisco figured out that being "woke" isn't a good look
Law by oldedude     August 7, 2022 5:19 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: (0 comments) [17 views]

Trump wins CPAC straw poll, revs up campaign speculation as Biden's polling collapses
Politics by HatetheSwamp     August 6, 2022 2:36 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (7 comments) [100 views]

Which is worse, calling COVID "the China virus" or starting World War III?
Government by HatetheSwamp     August 6, 2022 6:30 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: oldedude (2 comments) [44 views]

This trans cyclist inadvertently reveals why women's sports need limits.
Recreation by Curt_Anderson     August 6, 2022 11:31 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: Donna (1 comments) [47 views]

Opinion selectors, pages, etc.