Comments posted organically
Californians understandably gripe about having ''only'' two US senators, but...

By Curt_Anderson
October 6, 2021 11:01 am
Category: History

(0.0 from 0 votes)
SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Share
Rules of the Post
Rate this article
(5=best, 0=poor)
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars

if our Founders hadn't reached a compromise between small and large states (by a single vote), there wouldn't be an American democracy in which to discuss the issue.

A Great Compromise
July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.


Cited and related links:

  1. senate.gov

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Californians understandably gripe about having ''only'' two US senators, but...":

  1. by Donna on October 7, 2021 7:08 am
    So our country should be stuck forever with a 234-year old decision that has outlived its purpose and now undermines the very democracy it was designed to create?


  2. by Ponderer on October 7, 2021 8:34 am

    I doubt that the Framers ever imagined the overwhelmingly massive disparity of just one county in one state having a larger population than several other entire states combined.

    We need a Constitutional Modernization.

    Unfortunately, the Republicans will somehow manage to be the ones who oversee it.


  3. by Curt_Anderson on October 7, 2021 8:40 am
    There are two solutions to your two Senator problem:
    1. Pass a constitutional amendment allowing for a proportional number of senators per state.
    2. Divide California into two or more states.


  4. by Donna on October 7, 2021 10:02 am
    1 will not happen.

    2 is highly unlikely.

    So I guess we're just going to get used to minority rule by red states and watch the rest of the free world enjoy things that we'll never be allowed to have.


  5. by Donna on October 7, 2021 10:05 am
    I meant to type "I guess we're just going to have to get used to minority rule by red states..."


Comment on: "Californians understandably gripe about having ''only'' two US senators, but..."

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:
SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page


From our contributors:
Display Order:

Don't shed any tears for Liz Cheney
Opinion by islander     August 14, 2022 8:37 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: (0 comments) [4 views]


'The FBI Raid On Melania's Closet Was Justified,' Says Merrick Garland Wearing Gorgeous New Evening Gown And Sun Hat
Humor by HatetheSwamp     August 14, 2022 4:04 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [18 views]


Defamation Suit About Election Falsehoods Puts Fox on Its Heels
Law by Donna     August 14, 2022 7:42 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [22 views]


We may finally find out if Trump actually has evidence of fraud in the 2020 election
Law by Curt_Anderson     July 27, 2022 10:22 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: Donna (39 comments) [388 views]


Trump Lawyer Told Justice Dept. That Classified Material Had Been Returned
Law by Curt_Anderson     August 13, 2022 10:27 am (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: oldedude (12 comments) [232 views]


Do you recognize this dweeb?
History by Curt_Anderson     August 13, 2022 4:49 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: islander (1 comments) [42 views]


Rally at Cheyenne FBI office planned for Sunday
Politics by Curt_Anderson     August 13, 2022 12:15 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [85 views]


For those who want to know part two
News by islander     August 11, 2022 1:27 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: oldedude (37 comments) [302 views]


Take your best guess: will Trump agree to unseal the warrant?
Law by Curt_Anderson     August 11, 2022 3:29 pm (Rating: 5.0)
Last comment by: oldedude (28 comments) [328 views]


Chucky actually says what he means... scary stuff
007 James Bond by oldedude     August 12, 2022 2:57 pm (Rating: 0.0)
Last comment by: oldedude (21 comments) [126 views]


History selectors, pages, etc.