Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Trump Gets Called Out in Front of Millions at Pope’s Funeral
Religion by HatetheSwamp     April 26, 2025 8:55 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Navy2711 (3 comments) [48 views]


Election theft exposed in PA and other states.
Conspiracy by Indy!     April 24, 2025 9:40 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (7 comments) [87 views]


MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell’s legal team accused of submitting inaccurate, AI-generated brief to Colorado court
Humor by Curt_Anderson     April 26, 2025 7:19 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (1 comments) [21 views]


"No one is above the law."
Crime by HatetheSwamp     April 25, 2025 7:08 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (4 comments) [73 views]


Dimocrat Approval Rating Continues to Plummet
Entertainment by oldedude     April 25, 2025 12:28 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (8 comments) [82 views]


U.S. sent 238 migrants to Salvadoran mega-prison; documents indicate most have no apparent criminal records
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 26, 2025 9:12 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (23 comments) [221 views]


The Trump "peace plan": Ukraine surrenders to Russia.
International by Curt_Anderson     April 23, 2025 4:53 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: meagain (43 comments) [364 views]


Why do progressives still embrace the Dinosaur Media
Media by HatetheSwamp     April 26, 2025 6:18 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [94 views]


CBS News: Pete Hegseth does his own makeup
Fashion by Curt_Anderson     April 25, 2025 6:20 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (5 comments) [62 views]


Man Saves Hundreds Of Thousands In Student Loans By Just Learning How To Hate Jews On The Internet
Education by HatetheSwamp     April 26, 2025 9:18 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [16 views]


Government selectors, pages, etc.
President of El Salvador says he won't return mistakenly deported man to U.S.
By HatetheSwamp
April 14, 2025 11:38 am
Category: Government

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


I don't know if I want to laugh at the audacity of puny US judges who presume they can run the foreign policy of other sovereign nations, or be angry at the Trump gang for the error it made.

Both, I guess.

I can't wait to see what they say tonight on the metaphorical Rachel, baha.

El Salvador President Nayib Bukele told reporters during a meeting with President Donald Trump on Monday that he would not return a man the Justice Department said it had mistakenly deported to his country.

"How can I return him to the United States? Like if I smuggle him into the United States?" Bukele said, sitting beside Trump in the Oval Office, when asked if he’d return Kilmar Abrego Garcia. "Of course I'm not going to do it. The question is preposterous."

Justice Department officials have acknowledged that Garcia should not have been sent to El Salvador because of an immigration judge's 2019 order barring him from being sent there, and the Supreme Court has called his removal illegal and directed the administration to "facilitate" his return while being respectful of the president's authority.

In the Oval Office meeting, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he didn’t understand “the confusion” over the order, arguing “the foreign policy of the United States is conducted by the president of the United States, not by a court, and no court in the United States has a right to conduct a foreign policy of the United States.”

Attorney General Pam Bondi added, "If they want to return him, we would facilitate it, meaning provide a plane. That’s up for El Salvador if they want to return him. That’s not up to us.”


Dem lawfare, obviously, has its limits.


Cited and related links:

  1. nbcnews.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "President of El Salvador says he won't return mistakenly deported man to U.S.":

  1. by Curt_Anderson on April 14, 2025 12:05 pm
    Pathetic. You are pathetic in your glee over a wrongfully detained man put into a hellhole. The El Salvador president's response was a pathetic. Trump's smile out of one side of his mouth while the El Salvadorian gave his lame response is pathetic. It is pathetic that a large portion of US citizens are OK with imprisoning people within the US without any due process. It's pathetic that Trump cannot force the hand of Bukele on this issue when he claims he can force the hand of every countries' leadership over trade issues.


  2. by HatetheSwamp on April 14, 2025 12:15 pm

    Curt,

    Read my post again. I'm angry at what the brainless Trump thugs did...

    ... but for you worshipers of the Dem/progressive lawfare cabal. I'm doing some serious kneeslapping that any US Court thinks that it can run the foreign policy of another sovereign nation.

    Bahahahahahahahahahaha.


  3. by Curt_Anderson on April 14, 2025 12:24 pm
    Obvioulsly Trump told President Bukele not to return Garcia. Bukele would not have made that preposterous excuse for his inability to return him otherwise. America is paying Bukele $6 million to house our deportees. Clearly Trump has leverage, but he refuses to use it. If he can't that is really pathetic.

    In the past we deported criminals, prohibition era mobsters for example. They are sent back to their native countries, but not imprisoned and certainly not imprisoned in a foreign prison with an indeterminant sentence.


  4. by HatetheSwamp on April 14, 2025 12:33 pm

    "Obvioulsly Trump told President Bukele not to return Garcia."

    Obviously? Nah.

    More likely, probably. Very probably.

    But, you still can't cringe over the Supreme Court presuming it can run El Salvador's foreign policy.

    Holy freakin friggin EFFINcow, man!


  5. by Indy! on April 14, 2025 1:03 pm

    Amazing how little Brown Shorts understands about how our country works.


  6. by oldedude on April 14, 2025 7:54 pm
    And how little the "grazers" (sheeple) do.


  7. by oldedude on April 14, 2025 7:55 pm
    You are pathetic in your glee over a wrongfully detained man put into a hellhole.

    And please cite how you know all this.


  8. by HatetheSwamp on April 15, 2025 3:27 am

    Right, OD. He's not wrongfully detailed. Wrong sent to El Salvador but he's rightly detained.

    He's adjudicated to be a member of MS-13.

    Oy, how progressives inside on be on the wrong side of 80/20 issues.


  9. by Curt_Anderson on April 15, 2025 8:30 am
    "He's adjudicated to be a member of MS-13." HtS

    Wrong. How is it conservatives like you are so frequently wrong on the facts? Or can you back your claim up? Plus you are wrong to imply being a member of MS-13 or any gang is in itself a crime.


  10. by HatetheSwamp on April 15, 2025 8:56 am

    Curt,

    I don't accuse you of lying. But, I have come to regard Impulsive Good German-ism as a mental illness... from which you suffer... Stage 4


    Straight from our Federal Government:

    Today, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem set the record straight about Kilmar Abrego Garcia in light of misleading mainstream media reports.

    “This was just one of those examples of an individual that is a MS-13 gang member, multiple charges and encounters with the individuals here, trafficking in his background, was found with other MS-13 gang members—very dangerous person, and what the liberal left and fake news are doing to turn him into a media darling is sickening..."


    dhs.gov


  11. by Curt_Anderson on April 15, 2025 9:44 am
    The dog killer is lying. She is another conservative wrong on the facts.

    "He was accused by local police in Maryland of being an MS-13 gang member. Abrego Garcia denied the allegation and was never charged, according to court records." --AP

    Accused is not "adjudicated"

    Btw, citing the Trump administration as evidence of Trump administration claims is not evidence. Find a reliable source for your "adjudicated" claim.

    apnews.com


  12. by oldedude on April 15, 2025 8:28 pm
    I think she actually has a fuckload more facts than you do about this. Legally, what you have is third party hearsay. She's looking at the court documents. AND you've been outvoted once again by SCOTUS. My recommendation to you is that you shut up and color awhile. I'm losing faith in you in actually presenting a workable post. At least I can follow yours, donna's (generally), and bob's (generally). Were you riding the dragon or did you hit the meth really hard last week? You didn't come out of that well.


  13. by Curt_Anderson on April 15, 2025 9:06 pm
    Thanks OD! We all know that your histrionics are your way of saying that you cannot refute the facts I presented but you cannot quite admit that I am correct.

    Btw, have you figured out what you are going to post when the courts tell the Trump administration that they are violating the Constitution?


  14. by oldedude on April 15, 2025 9:37 pm
    I didn't say that at all. You're just being a dikead which is more your MO the longer you're on this site.

    The courts have already spoke. And I'm not surprised you didn't understand it. So you might want to look at the fucking news for the past week. Or you should google YOUR OWN SHIT before you post it. You need to find your own fucking sources that states there must be a trial by jury in order to be valid. AND you need to cite that sending a person back to their home country is "cruel and unusual punishment."

    SCOTUS already ruled a week ago. They said that under the Alien and Sedition Acts (1798) he was clear to deport those non-US citizens, with ONE MINOR CHANGE. And that was they needed to see a judge. JUST LIKE I"VE SAID FOUR TIMES NOW.

    And it's something I support. The two folks that apparently were "mistakes" could have been easily corrected when they saw the judge. Prosecution doesn't have a case file on "John Smyth" oops. Prosecution needs to check their shit. That is, as I've explained before, "due process" as SCOTUS sees it. I am also trying to follow US protocol in these cases. You're just arguing to argue.

    and since you're stupid enough that you can't check the decision, I cited it for you. Signed and printed on 7 April,, 2025. You can read the dissenting votes, but it passed in the affirmative. That's a whole 2 pages you'll have to read. I trust you could make it through that by tomorrow?
    supremecourt.gov


  15. by Curt_Anderson on April 15, 2025 10:02 pm
    OD, thanks again for confirming what I said in another post that the immigrants that Trump wants to deport deserve due process in real judicial court where they can mount a defense and not simply in front of a Trump administration employed immigration judge.

    From the Supreme Court ruling that OD cited:
    “It is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law” in the context of removal proceedings. Reno v. Flores, 507 U. S. 292, 306 (1993). So, the detainees are entitled to notice and opportunity to be heard “appropriate to the nature of the case.” Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U. S. 306, 313 (1950). More specifically, in this context, AEA detainees must receive notice after the date of this order that they are subject to removal under the Act. The notice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs.




    I don't think we will be hearing anymore about Trump rounding up and hustling off immigrants onto an El Salvador-bound plane. Either the immigrants will be getting their due process rights or there will be a battle between the Supreme Court and the Trump administration.


  16. by HatetheSwamp on April 16, 2025 4:08 am

    "...in the context of removal proceedings. Reno v. Flores, 507 U. S. 292, 306 (1993)"

    "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means." -Inigo Montoya


  17. by oldedude on April 16, 2025 7:57 am
    Didn't you go to the "We hate America" rally last weekend? Because while everyone else was taking shots of the koolaid, you were drinking the growler.

    Re: #15. WE agree on that. I've been trying to tell you that. YOU believe that it requires a jury trial. It doesn't say that. That's the ONLY fucking difference you've been fighting with me about. You are so steadfast in arguing you don't have the capability of any objectivity. This is like arguing with wrongagain when he locks into one word of your post and nothing else matters, even that it's taken out of context.



  18. by Indy! on April 16, 2025 8:33 am

    Trump is getting rick-rolled by El Salvador. 😂 And he imagines himself a strong man dictator. No wonder Putin and the other dictators of the world are laughing at him behind his back.


  19. by Curt_Anderson on April 16, 2025 8:39 am
    No I don't believe a jury trial is the only sort trial that can protect potential deportees' rights. A single judge is fine. But it must include "judicial review", as the Supreme Court puts it. In other words, a real court controlled by the third branch of government, the judiciary. That is not simply an administration employed immigration judge in a slam, bam, next immigration court.

    That is why I don't believe Trump will be successful in his mass deportation efforts because the Trump administration will not want to go through the niceties of due process.


Go To Top

Comment on: "President of El Salvador says he won't return mistakenly deported man to U.S."


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page