Document labeling Abrego Garcia as a gang member written by fired Prince George’s Co. officer
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 17, 2025 12:01 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (14 comments) [155 views]

One might think that being a weekend host on FOX News would be sufficient training to be the Defense Secretary
Military by Curt_Anderson     April 20, 2025 10:06 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [8 views]

Remember when our own po, and MILLIONS of progressives, shat all over the notion of due process?
Law by HatetheSwamp     April 20, 2025 6:49 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (13 comments) [165 views]

Remember when OD thought Ron DeSantis was going to get Floridians a tax refund? 😂
Politics by Indy!     April 20, 2025 9:13 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (9 comments) [127 views]

OUR SIGNS FOR TOMORROW:
Education by Ponderer     April 18, 2025 5:39 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (14 comments) [285 views]

Rebels without a Cause!!!!
Politics by HatetheSwamp     April 20, 2025 2:45 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (9 comments) [103 views]

The Trump administration isn't just corrupt, it's incompetent
President by Curt_Anderson     April 19, 2025 12:25 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Ponderer (6 comments) [105 views]

While Fox sleeps... DEI strikes the heart of American heritage and values!
Conspiracy by Indy!     April 19, 2025 5:06 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (2 comments) [41 views]

Supreme Court temporarily pauses deportations under Alien Enemies Act
International by Ponderer     April 19, 2025 6:45 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (13 comments) [138 views]

pb's Legal Goober #3 with Clay and Buck on Tishy James' troubles
Crime by HatetheSwamp     April 19, 2025 3:13 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [9 views]

US Supreme Court lets Trump pursue deportations under 1798 law By HatetheSwamp April 8, 2025 4:05 am Category: Law (0.0 from 0 votes) Rules of the Post Write A New Article How To Post Here

Despite one poster here claiming to have the knowledge of a former Supreme Court clerk and current Ivy League law school prof, pb thinks this is reasonable and was to be expected.

With Susie Wiles as Chief of Staff, Trump 2.0 is much more "ready for Prime Time" than during the first time around.

The court, in an unsigned 5-4 ruling powered by conservative justices, granted the administration's request to lift Washington-based U.S. Judge James Boasberg's March 15 order that had temporarily blocked the summary deportations under Trump's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act while litigation in the case continues.

Detainees "must receive notice after the date of this order that they are subject to removal under the Act. The notice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs," the majority wrote.

In Monday's decision, the court said that to challenge the legitimacy of their detention under the Alien Enemies Act detainees must pursue so-called habeas corpus claims in the federal judicial district where a detainee is located. That means that the proper venue for this litigation was in Texas, not the District of Columbia, the court said.

That last paragraph is the real point. The progressive Swampcult has been judge shopping to thwart Trump. It's that that the Court shot down.

Eh, po? Keehee ha, ahhhhhhhhhhh.

Cited and related links:

1. reuters.com

Comments Start Below

by Indy! on April 8, 2025 5:13 am If Trump said to the conservative Clowns of the "Court" to get down on their knees and open their mouths - they would all do it and claim an 1898 law justified it. The only difference between the Supreme Clowns and a regular street prostitute is the street prostitute only needs to lie about their jobs when cops are within earshot. by meagain on April 8, 2025 7:55 am It seems to have escaped the notice of the majority on the SC that the power is granted to the President for use in a time of war. At the time. that would have been aimed at the French. It would rank as an Emergency Act only to be used in extreme situations against a specific wartime enemy. by HatetheSwamp on April 8, 2025 8:00 am It seems to have escaped the notice of the majority on the SC that the power is granted to the President for use in a time of war. You are absolutely, positively 100% wrong. by Indy! on April 8, 2025 8:09 am An Act Concerning Aliens. SEC. 6. And be it further enacted, That this act shall continue and be in force for and during the term of two years from the passing thereof. An Act Respecting Alien Enemies SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That this act shall continue and be in force until the third day of March, one thousand eight hundred and one (Indy: 1801), and no longer: Provided, that the expiration of the act shall not prevent or defeat a prosecution and punishment of any offence against the law, during the time it shall be in force. Indy: So, (unless there are any survivors from 1801 who were affected by this law) seems like it should no longer be enforceable. UNLESS - of course - you have a bunch of paid-off whores on the Supreme Court willing to do anything you tell them to do. by Indy! on April 8, 2025 8:10 am PS: Please not proper use of BOLD text as well. 😌 by Curt_Anderson on April 8, 2025 8:45 am This decision is being characterized as a win for the Trump administration. I don't believe that's quite accurate. The Supreme Court ruled that Trump can use this wartime act "for now". It also ruled on procedural grounds in as much the defense attorneys need to re-file in a Texas court. I think the main thing that the court decided is that potential deportees must get their day in court and have a chance to challenge the deportation. Supreme Court clears way for deportations of alleged Venezuelan gang members to resume, but with chance for judicial review It added that going forward, detainees subject to the 1798 law "must receive notice" that they face removal under the Alien Enemies Act. "The notice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs," the court said. cbsnews.com by HatetheSwamp on April 8, 2025 9:30 am "This decision is being characterized as a win for the Trump administration. I don't believe that's quite accurate. The Supreme Court ruled that Trump can use this wartime act "for now". It also ruled on procedural grounds in as much the defense attorneys need to re-file in a Texas court. I think the main thing that the court decided is that potential deportees must get their day in court and have a chance to challenge the deportation. Curt, I love it when you bring your expertise as John Jay's clerk into the SS conversation. What Trump won is a victory over judge shopping. I think his 2.0 plan has been sanitized by the Susie Wiles influence, and has a better chance of passing Supreme Court muster than previously. But, I think that the Court will do all it can to insure that illegals get their due process before it kicks their @$$€$ out the door. I hope it does. by Indy! on April 8, 2025 11:07 am Every case brought before the Supreme Clowns is a case of "judge shopping" for the right. At least one of those judges wasn't even the GOP's pick. by meagain on April 8, 2025 12:59 pm "You are absolutely, positively 100% wrong" Am I? Then how about this? " The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 is a federal law that gives the president wartime authority to deport non-U.S. citizens of enemy countries ..." "There are three provisions of the Alien Enemies Act that allow the president to deport immigrants from enemy countries: In times of declared war, which requires an act of Congress In times of a perpetrated, attempted, or threatened invasion In times of a “predatory incursion” against U.S. territory" https://statesunited.org/resources/facts-about-alien-enemies-act/ You are just a troll. by HatetheSwamp on April 8, 2025 2:34 pm It's the predatory incursion part that fits. by oldedude on April 8, 2025 4:34 pm Sorry lead, I didn't see your thread. my bad. by oldedude on April 8, 2025 4:38 pm It's the predatory incursion part that fits. The Supreme Court on Monday threw out a judge's decision to block the removal of men alleged to be members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua to El Salvador without any legal process under the Alien Enemies Act. Like curt said the gangsters need time for a habeas corpus hearing to see if the law is applied. They can do this from jail. The main points were; 1. "An activist judge in Washington, DC does not have the jurisdiction to seize control of President Trump’s authority to conduct foreign policy and keep the American people safe," Attorney General Pam Bondi said on X. 2. Are they members of a transnational gang. (must answer "yes") 3. Are they US citizens. (Must answer "no") 4. Do their actions fall under the Alien Enemies Act (must answer "yes") My guess is that they'll give everyone an hour or so in court, let prosecution state the case, let them defend themselves and that will be that. Hopefully though, if there's a "wrong person" in the group that'll be found out (a little late, but still before they're back in el Salvadore). So if there are name mixups, etc, that will be one more checkpoint so they don't deport the wrong folks. nbcnews.com by oldedude on April 8, 2025 4:54 pm For everyone, here's the biggest thing about the SCOTUS decision."An activist judge in Washington, DC does not have the jurisdiction to seize control of President Trump’s authority to conduct foreign policy and keep the American people safe," Attorney General Pam Bondi said on X. In essence, they overturned the judge because (Law 101) he has to have a crime in his district. The district he decided on was in Texas. curt- Supreme Court clears way for deportations of alleged Venezuelan gang members to resume, but with chance for judicial review They've actually reviewed it as of late yesterday. So I did a synopsis and citation above. Just to catch you up. "The notice must be afforded within a reasonable time and in such a manner as will allow them to actually seek habeas relief in the proper venue before such removal occurs," the court said. They can do court by video from the jail. The habeas corpus "relief" the judge has to agree to. If it fits the criteria above, there's no "relief." See above. nbcnews.com Go To Top

Find old posts & articles

Show Most Recent Articles Articles by category: Politics+ Religion+ Law & Crime Military News Media History Health Sports+ Humor Entertainment Misc.

Report spam & abuse SelectSmart.com home page