Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Palestinians Take a Brave Move. They actually take to the streets against Hamas.
Dungeons & Dragons by oldedude     March 25, 2025 5:06 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (21 comments) [307 views]


Every American is potentially a Frengel Reyes Mota now
Dungeons & Dragons by Donna     March 30, 2025 4:50 pm (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments) [128 views]


Elon Musk reveals DOGE’s new target — members of Congress who got ‘strangely wealthy’
Crime by HatetheSwamp     March 31, 2025 8:22 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [58 views]


Trump underwater in approval/disapproval polls already.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     March 30, 2025 11:26 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [79 views]


Bill Maher favors cutting public broadcasting funding, rejects NPR CEO’s testimony that outlet is unbiased
Media by HatetheSwamp     March 29, 2025 4:41 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (16 comments) [160 views]


Trump said tariffs will cause prices to drop. So why is he warning manufacturers not to raise prices?
Business by Curt_Anderson     March 29, 2025 11:32 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: meagain (8 comments) [179 views]


A request to SSers who post videos.
Opinion by Curt_Anderson     March 30, 2025 12:29 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (8 comments) [96 views]


Bernie Sanders In Trouble As Paid Rally Attendees Vote To Unionize
Government by HatetheSwamp     March 30, 2025 2:18 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [53 views]


A request to SSers who post articles behind pay walls
Media by HatetheSwamp     March 30, 2025 6:03 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [50 views]


Why are we allowing one man, Donald Trump, to destroy America?
Wild Animals by Donna     March 28, 2025 8:24 am (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [87 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
Supreme Court puts Trump back on Colorado Republican primary ballot
By HatetheSwamp
March 4, 2024 7:13 am
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


You were sooooooo wrong, po.

"The unanimous decision in Trump's favor by the Supreme Court — which means votes he garners on Tuesday's ballot will count for him — was not a surprise."

An unelected bureaucrat or state judge can remove a candidate from a federal ballot.

Yeah, right. Baha.

Oh. And, pb nailed it.


Cited and related links:

  1. cnbc.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Supreme Court puts Trump back on Colorado Republican primary ballot":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 7:25 am

    In Major Blow To Democracy, Supreme Court Rules Voters Can Vote For Favorite Candidate

    You wokesters are mo-rons.

    babylonbee.com


  2. by Indy! on March 4, 2024 8:24 am

    Actually we can't vote for who we want. Not because of any laws or states standing in the way - because the parties will never nominate anyone who doesn't work for the corporate masters.


  3. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 8:40 am

    You do have a point.


  4. by oldedude on March 4, 2024 9:01 am
    So SCOTUS did this in a 9-0 ruling. This was just an example of SCOTUS having to make stupid rulings because democrat, billionaire-dick-sucking, Constitutional duty-screwing, corrupt, despicable whores use SCOTUS' time on stupid "stuff."

    They could have been taking on of Trump's immunity case instead.


  5. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 9:04 am

    Here's analysis of the decision by pb's Legal Goobers #s 2 and 3... and Fox's Shannon Bream who's at least as insightful as any of pb's Legal Goobers.

    BTW, the Court settled the case, essentially, exactly, the way pb said it would!

    Good stuff.

    View Video


  6. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 10:59 am

    pb's Legal Goober #1 and friends on the 9-0 Supreme Court decision:

    View Video


  7. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 11:39 am

    CNN Legal Eagles on the 9-0 decision:

    View Video


  8. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 11:43 am

    "The people who keep telling you “Democracy is on the ballot” are mad because the Supreme Court didn’t ban their political opponent." ~ Jimmy Failla


  9. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 12:37 pm

    Megyn Kelly: woke meltdown...

    Baha baha!

    View Video


  10. by islander on March 4, 2024 1:28 pm

    The 9-0 SCOTUS decision was correct in my opinion. While I can fully understand why those of us who saw Trump and his supporter’s criminal actions on and before Jan 6, believe that morally and ethically Trump should not be on the ballot, and I’m one of them, an individual state should not have the authority to to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment for "Federal" candidates.

    “Federal election rules and regulations”, in my opinion, should be uniform across all 50 states. Since, in a Federal election, unlike local state, county, or town elections, which only affect the residents in that state, a person’s vote in a Federal election, no matter what state the person lives in, directly affects all of us. no matter which state we live in.


  11. by Indy! on March 4, 2024 1:35 pm
    by oldedude on March 4, 2024 9:01 am

    So SCOTUS did this in a 9-0 ruling. This was just an example of SCOTUS having to make stupid rulings because democrat, billionaire-dick-sucking, Constitutional duty-screwing, corrupt, despicable whores use SCOTUS' time on stupid "stuff."

    They could have been taking on of Trump's immunity case instead.



    You spelled "wasting" wrong, OD.


  12. by HatetheSwamp on March 4, 2024 1:38 pm

    Bang on, isle.

    As pb's Legal Goober #1 pointed out from the beginning, Section 5 of the 14th Amendment is clear and simple:

    "The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."

    po's knickers got soiled over protestations that Section 3 is self-executing, and that's horsepucky. The Amendment could not possibly more direct and clear.

    I'm curious, isle, what the response is in Maine since it was an unelected Maine bureaucrat who was leading the charge?


  13. by oldedude on March 4, 2024 1:38 pm
    no, I said what I wanted to.


  14. by islander on March 4, 2024 2:08 pm

    "Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows had ruled that Trump was ineligible for the Maine ballot, although she held off enforcing the decision while the courts considered the issue. Bellows reversed course on Monday and modified her ruling hours after the Supreme Court decision.

    “The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that individual states lack authority to enforce Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment with respect to federal offices,” Bellows said in a statement. “Consistent with my oath and obligation to follow the law and the Constitution….I hereby withdraw my determination that Mr. Trump’s primary petition is invalid."
    pressherald.com


Go To Top

Comment on: "Supreme Court puts Trump back on Colorado Republican primary ballot"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. © 1999 - 2025 Selectsmart®.com - Do not copy without written permission. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page