Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

How Joe Biden cajoled and courted Mike Johnson to have a chance to deliver aid to Ukraine
President by Curt_Anderson     April 19, 2024 9:28 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (1 comments) [18 views]


Speaker Johnson moves forward with foreign aid package, even if it risks his job
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 18, 2024 5:29 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (19 comments) [701 views]


Politifact finally gets one right...
President by HatetheSwamp     April 19, 2024 1:39 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [49 views]


Man sets himself on fire outside Trump’s ‘hush money’ trial in NYC
Humor by HatetheSwamp     April 19, 2024 12:02 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (4 comments) [58 views]


Preoccupied Trump too busy to browbeat Mike Johnson into withholding military aid from our allies.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 19, 2024 12:01 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [11 views]


NPR under fire after it suspends editor detesting newsroom partisanship: 'Hard left propaganda machine'
Media by HatetheSwamp     April 17, 2024 3:46 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (28 comments) [362 views]


I just voted in the Pennsylvania primary...mail-in
Government by HatetheSwamp     April 18, 2024 7:15 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (5 comments) [119 views]


A Playmate, a porn star, an ex-president and Mr. Pecker. Get plenty of popcorn!
Entertainment by Curt_Anderson     April 14, 2024 3:46 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (22 comments) [647 views]


Israel has carried out a strike inside Iran, US official tells CNN, as region braces for further escalation
Military by HatetheSwamp     April 19, 2024 3:31 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [27 views]


Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (21 comments) [1037 views]


Crime selectors, pages, etc.
Holy FrigginFreakinEFFIN Cow! Supreme Court agrees to hear Trump immunity claim!
By HatetheSwamp
February 28, 2024 2:54 pm
Category: Crime

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to rule on whether former President Donald Trump is immune from criminal charges in his federal election interference case.

The high court granted Trump's request to pause the case from moving forward until they decide whether an ex-president is immune from being prosecuted for official acts performed while in office, as Trump claims.

The justices are poised to proceed quickly, with Trump's court briefs due within three weeks and oral arguments set for the week of pb's birthday. But it could take months for the court to issue an opinion.

If the justices rule in Trump's favor, the case will be dismissed.

The decision to take up the immunity claim extends a pause on a prior ruling from a lower appeals court, which roundly rejected Trump's argument that he cannot be prosecuted for challenging the 2020 election results because he was president at the time.

Special counsel Jack Smith, who is prosecuting Trump in D.C., had urged the Supreme Court not to let Trump delay the election interference case any further.


Big loss for the rush to justice crowd that believes Trump will lose if they can railroad him into a conviction before the election.

Big loss. Big, big loss. Heck! Big EFFINloss.


Cited and related links:

  1. cnbc.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Holy FrigginFreakinEFFIN Cow! Supreme Court agrees to hear Trump immunity claim!":

  1. by Indy! on February 28, 2024 3:12 pm

    They will most likely rule against him (unless they want even peebs here to realize they ARE the swamp), but that's not the objective here. The objective is to delay justice long enough to save Trump.


  2. by HatetheSwamp on February 28, 2024 3:24 pm

    Indy,

    I'm inclined to agree that they'll rule against him. But, the question they say they'll consider leaves an open door...

    ..."they (will) decide whether an ex-president is immune from being prosecuted for official acts performed while in office..."

    This ain't about Trump. It's about the Separation of Powers and the presidency.

    But, be honest with yourself. This is about Jack Smith desperately wanting to get a trial finished before a DC jury prior to the election. That's still possible, but not as likely...

    ...and what the Court just did is tell Jack that they ain't playing his game.


  3. by Curt_Anderson on February 28, 2024 3:30 pm
    "Big loss for the rush to justice crowd..." --HtS

    It's a case that's been three years in the making. Hardly a rush to judgment.

    It's a win for the "justice delayed is justice denied" crowd.

    Don't bet that it's ultimately a win for Trump. It's possible that a jury could find him innocent of election interference. Now he has a possible guilty verdict hanging over his head like Damocles sword. Most voters have reached a conclusion about Trump's guilt or innocence. An innocent person wouldn't be delaying every court case like Trump does. An innocent person would want the chance to clear their name as soon as possible. Most voters get that.

    If non-Trump voters needed any extra incentive to vote against Trump they have it. Trump has already promised to pardon (or equivalent) himself. That doesn't sit well with the "nobody is above the law" crowd. By voting for Joe Biden they will be doing their part in keeping Trump out of office and in the courtrooms.

    As an added bonus, Trump is burning through more high-priced lawyer legal fees.



  4. by Ponderer on February 28, 2024 4:46 pm

    Joe Biden will be reelected in a landslide. Huge. I've already been saying this for quite some time now.


  5. by oldedude on February 28, 2024 8:33 pm
    Curt- If this has been going on for four years(?) why is it just getting to SCOTUS? It seems to me this would have been set up beforehand.

    I'm not saying he'll win this, as I've said several times. I don't see his reading of "immunity" being a constitutional reading. I think this part of his SCOTUS stuff will not bring him happiness. I'm okay with that, needless to say.

    I really wish the dims would have had their shit together a long time ago. They don't. They could have cleared this up no less than two years ago had they done that. Why did it take this long? Because the cases for this weren't proposed by the dims.

    I'm pretty sure this is strictly on the dims timeline. So I don't fault them, I just wish they would have done it earlier. It's a bit of a chickenshit move. But it's politics also.

    Adding a note: This is why Nikki hasn't gotten out. She's the only one on the GOP side that still is in the race and can pull out the numbers without going to other primaries. And, she's going to pick up a lot of pedojoe votes. She may lose the "only trumpsters." but the only trumpsters won't vote for a dim anyway.


  6. by Curt_Anderson on February 28, 2024 8:56 pm
    "Curt- If this has been going on for four years(?) why is it just getting to SCOTUS?" ---OD

    I said three years. I was referring to the federal election interference case (Jack Smith's case) that has been years in the making.

    SCOTUS is deciding on Trump's claim of presidential immunity for any and all crimes (including sending Seal Team Six to kill a political opponent) That issue is only a few months old, as Trump repeatedly appeals court rulings against him.



  7. by Indy! on February 28, 2024 9:28 pm

    "This ain't about Trump. It's about the Separation of Powers and the presidency."

    BWAHHH-hahaha HAhahaHAHA hahaha woo-hoo haha-HAHA oh lordy... lordy GOOD LORD haha HAHAHA bwaa-ha-ha haha HAhahaHAHA hahaha woo-hoo HA HAHA hahahaaaah! Jesus, help me haha HAHAHAHAHA teehee woo-hoo laaaawdy... HAHA ha-haa bwaaah-ha-ha gracious haha HAHAHA bwaa-ha-ha haha HAhahaHAHA! hahaha woo-hoo HA HAHA hahahaaaah! hahaha HAhahaHAHA hahaha woo-hoo haha-HAHA help me Jesus! Gracious my ha-ha-ha BWAAAH-haha HAAAAAA hah-ha oh-ho help me, help me haha HAHAHA bwaa-ha-ha haha HAhahaHAHA hahaha woo-hoo HA HAHA hahahaaaah! No please not again... WAHHH-hahaha HAhahaHAHA hahaha woo-hoo haha-HAHA! Bwaaaha HAHAHA bwaa-ha-ha haha HAhahaHAHA hahaha woo-hoo HA HAHA hahahaaaah! GOOD LORD Jesus, help me haha HAHAHAHAHA woo-hoo laaaawdy... Oh that's rich... tell me another one...

    Nope. It's about Trump.


  8. by oldedude on February 29, 2024 3:00 am
    Curt- Okay on the timeline. My point was more about getting these to the courts right before the elections. Like I've said. Alot. I don't see any reason a court would find in his favor. That doesn't make sense to me at all. Yes, there are "some" issues, but not what trumpster is talking about. At all. So just to clarify my position on this hasn't changed.



  9. by Indy! on February 29, 2024 9:12 am

    Anyone else notice that the Clowns jumped right on that Colorado thing - but they're putting this one off for a couple months?

    It's all about pay back for the Clown's masters.


  10. by HatetheSwamp on February 29, 2024 9:38 am

    They expedited the Primary election thing because primaries are taking place now. Even at that, they haven't issued a ruling.

    In this case, there's no reason to rush the immunity ruling... except if your election strategy involves lawfare.


  11. by Indy! on February 29, 2024 10:12 am

    You have a LOT of excuses for the Swamp for a guy who pretends to hate the Swamp.


  12. by HatetheSwamp on February 29, 2024 10:29 am

    Not at all.

    What they are doing with the immunity case is perfectly usual.

    The mild surprise for me is that they took the case. pb's Legal Goobers doubted they would.


  13. by Curt_Anderson on February 29, 2024 10:45 am
    “Perfectly usual”!? There is nothing usual about this immunity case before the Supreme Court.


  14. by HatetheSwamp on February 29, 2024 10:57 am

    Really, Curt? The maddening thing for the Dem progressive Swampcult is that the courts have handled it is a very usual way.

    Your take seems to be that the Bill of Rights doesn't apply to Trump. Clearly, the federal Judiciary doesn't agree.


  15. by Indy! on February 29, 2024 12:52 pm

    I stick by my already proven and holding 100% completely accurate assessment that every decision the Clowns make is based on politics... including this one.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Holy FrigginFreakinEFFIN Cow! Supreme Court agrees to hear Trump immunity claim!"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page