Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Man sets himself on fire outside Trump’s ‘hush money’ trial in NYC
Humor by HatetheSwamp     April 19, 2024 12:02 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (4 comments) [42 views]

Speaker Johnson moves forward with foreign aid package, even if it risks his job
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 18, 2024 5:29 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (17 comments) [516 views]

Preoccupied Trump too busy to browbeat Mike Johnson into withholding military aid from our allies.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 19, 2024 12:01 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [10 views]

NPR under fire after it suspends editor detesting newsroom partisanship: 'Hard left propaganda machine'
Media by HatetheSwamp     April 17, 2024 3:46 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (28 comments) [360 views]

I just voted in the Pennsylvania primary...mail-in
Government by HatetheSwamp     April 18, 2024 7:15 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (5 comments) [118 views]

A Playmate, a porn star, an ex-president and Mr. Pecker. Get plenty of popcorn!
Entertainment by Curt_Anderson     April 14, 2024 3:46 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (22 comments) [645 views]

Israel has carried out a strike inside Iran, US official tells CNN, as region braces for further escalation
Military by HatetheSwamp     April 19, 2024 3:31 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [25 views]

Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (21 comments) [1037 views]

Trump is daring judge to lock him up by intimidating jurors.
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 17, 2024 9:03 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (1 comments) [46 views]

Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price Faces Recall Vote After Crime Ravages Blue County
Crime by oldedude     April 16, 2024 1:38 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (3 comments) [137 views]

Law selectors, pages, etc.
Supreme Court Says It Hasn’t Identified Person Who Leaked Draft Abortion Opinion
By Curt_Anderson
January 19, 2023 3:44 pm
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post
SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

NY TIMES — The Supreme Court announced on Thursday that an internal investigation had failed to identify who leaked a draft of the opinion overturning Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that had established a constitutional right to abortion.

In a 20-page report, the court’s marshal, Gail A. Curley, who oversaw the inquiry, said that investigators had conducted 126 formal interviews of 97 employees, all of whom had denied being the source of the leak.


If you want to know the news of what just happened read the NY Times or some other news source. If you want to know the news before it happens, read the SelectSmart.com Post.

See my post #10 at the link below.
June 9, 2022 1:46 pm
HtS,
I will make a prediction about this leak. We, the public, will never know who leaked. I don't believe that the SCOTUS will ever uncover the leaker, but even if they do, they won't do anything (like firing a clerk) that reporters would notice.

That's because of three things:
1. The SCOTUS's investigation won't reveal anything. Leaking might be firing offense, but it's not a crime.
2. If it was a clerk, he or she would be smart enough not to leave any tracks (digital or otherwise).
3. I still have Ginni Thomas at the top of the suspect list.

Cited and related links:

  1. selectsmart.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Supreme Court Says It Hasn’t Identified Person Who Leaked Draft Abortion Opinion":

  1. by Ponderer on January 20, 2023 5:50 am

    It was Alito's wife. Or possibly Thomas's wife, but I suspect it was Alito's.

    Of course the SC isn't going to be able to "identify" who it was.

  2. by HatetheSwamp on January 20, 2023 6:00 am

    It'd be Woodward and Bernstein reporting to prove that a Justice's spouse had the text of the opinion.

    What do you know that the rest of the world don't?

  3. by Ponderer on January 20, 2023 6:24 am

    It's called "speculation", Bill. It's all anyone has at this point.


    speculation [ spek-yuh-ley-shuhn ]
    noun
    1. the contemplation or consideration of some subject: to engage in speculation on humanity's ultimate destiny.
    2. a single instance or process of consideration.
    3. a conclusion or opinion reached by such contemplation: These speculations are impossible to verify.
    4. conjectural consideration of a matter; conjecture or surmise: a report based on speculation rather than facts.

  4. by HatetheSwamp on January 20, 2023 6:29 am

    po,

    You weren't speculating. You were declaring. Read your post.

  5. by Ponderer on January 20, 2023 6:38 am

    And my declaration was mere speculation. A speculation I feel completely confident with.

    I don't see why that would be such a problem for you. None of your declarations are ever anything but speculation.

  6. by Donna on January 20, 2023 7:01 am

    Bill seems to be extra-determined to manufacture a debate this morning. He must be extra-bored.



  7. by HatetheSwamp on January 20, 2023 7:14 am

    More likely, it's that second mug of coffee. Or, that I rarely post with po this early in the day.

    Still, I stand by my declaration that, if a Supreme Court Justice's spouse had access to the Dobbs opinion, and po can prove it, po'll go down in history along side Woodward and Bernstein.

  8. by Ponderer on January 20, 2023 7:45 am

    I see.

    I am expected to back up every speculation I ever have with hard, verified evidence.

    But you are free to declare anything that you pull out of your ass as a forgone conclusion of fact without presenting a single piece of actual fact or evidence.

    I see.


    You are a despicable and deplorably flaming hypocrite, Bill.

  9. by HatetheSwamp on January 20, 2023 8:02 am

    No, po. You could simply say, "I believe..." or, "My guess is..."

    And, still, I'm correct that, for your speculation to hit the mark, and to prove it, would earn you a Pulitzer.

    It's otherworldly. Fantasy. Born of, what?, anti-GOP hysteria?

Go To Top

Comment on: "Supreme Court Says It Hasn’t Identified Person Who Leaked Draft Abortion Opinion"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
 SelectSmart.com home page