Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

There are interesting ramifications to today's SCOTUS decision.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     March 4, 2024 1:33 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (5 comments) [53 views]


TDSers: Here's why you should hold your horses on the presidential immunity decision
Crime by HatetheSwamp     March 5, 2024 3:56 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [9 views]


Jake Tapper makes off-color remark to an amused Nikki Haley.
Humor by Curt_Anderson     March 4, 2024 7:23 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments) [49 views]


"Behind closed doors, Joe is incredible"
President by HatetheSwamp     March 4, 2024 10:35 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (2 comments) [15 views]


SCOTUS: There is no denying Trump is an insurrectionist and an officer of the US.
Law by Curt_Anderson     March 4, 2024 3:35 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (4 comments) [83 views]


Supreme Court puts Trump back on Colorado Republican primary ballot
Law by HatetheSwamp     March 4, 2024 7:13 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: islander (14 comments) [120 views]


Trump crowd goes silent as he confuses Biden and Obama again 😞
Politics by Curt_Anderson     March 3, 2024 4:04 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (10 comments) [138 views]


Republicans are forced to admit Democrats (including Joe Biden) are smarter.
Opinion by Curt_Anderson     March 3, 2024 12:11 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [77 views]


Would you support a No Labels Nikki Haley/Tulsi Gabbard tickets
Politics by HatetheSwamp     March 4, 2024 3:22 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (2 comments) [19 views]


Voters Doubt Biden’s Leadership and Favor Trump, Times/Siena Poll Finds
President by HatetheSwamp     March 3, 2024 4:06 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (6 comments) [76 views]


Law selectors, pages, etc.
There was nothing stolen (passports or anything else) during the legal search of Mar-a-Lago
By islander
August 16, 2022 2:28 pm
Category: Law

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)


Like Marcy Wheeler said,

"At 12:49ET yesterday, the head of DOJ’s espionage section, Jay Bratt, informed Trump’s lawyers that the Agents who conducted the search of Mar-a-Lago had seized two expired passports and his still-active diplomatic passport; he invited someone to come get them after 2.

Later in the day, the former President went on his shitty website and claimed that the FBI, which attempted to return the passports within a week, had “stole” them.

The search worked from classified documents outward. The FBI was permitted to take any box that had a classified document in it, and any boxes stored where boxes storing classified documents were stashed.

Any physical documents with classification markings, along with any containers/boxes (including any other contents) in which such documents are located, as well as any other containers/boxes that are collectively stored or found together with the aforementioned documents and containers/boxes;

So if Trump stored his diplo passport in the leather-bound box where he stored the TS/SCI documents he stole, the FBI would have taken it under the search protocols. The same would happen if his expired passports were in a box in the storage closet where he stored his other stolen classified documents.

As the FBI explained in a statement, this is how it works.

In executing search warrants, the FBI follows search and seizure procedures ordered by courts, then returns items that do not need to be retained for law enforcement purposes.

And because Trump is a privileged white collar criminal suspect, he was lucky enough to get things that are out of scope immediately, rather than months later.

Unsurprisingly, then, Trump took an example of the FBI being diligent and used it to gin up outrage.

Worse for him, he is wasting his time."

Click the link to read it for yourself:


Cited and related links:

  1. documentcloud.org

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "There was nothing stolen (passports or anything else) during the legal search of Mar-a-Lago ":

  1. by oldedude on August 16, 2022 6:39 pm
    They also "followed" their "protocol" when lying to the FISA court about a document Peter Strzok gave them.

    Our opinions differ. Period. I don't mean to "insult" you by telling you your wrong, I have just reached a different conclusion. This is factual information, and the same people (minus strzok and the lawyer) are still in their hierarchy, working at the same office that wrote this affidavit and warrant. They risked EVERYTHING including their careers to knowingly use false information in a warrant. This warrant, they said, was an "emergency" under exigent circumstances, but the Director sat on it for two weeks. That doesn't make sense. For them to put out propaganda that people fall hook, line and sinker for is somewhat expected. I actually empathize with TDS, but he doesn't live in my head, nor in my life. I'm more interested in the Republic I defended all my adult life.

    If you can tell me that you are not looking at Trumps past actions and making a preconceived opinion about Trump (with a straight face) I'll listen. Until then, this whole thing doesn't make sense.


Go To Top

Comment on: "There was nothing stolen (passports or anything else) during the legal search of Mar-a-Lago "

* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page