Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

NPR under fire after it suspends editor detesting newsroom partisanship: 'Hard left propaganda machine'
Media by HatetheSwamp     April 17, 2024 3:46 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (25 comments) [321 views]


I just voted in the Pennsylvania primary...mail-in
Government by HatetheSwamp     April 18, 2024 7:15 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [103 views]


Trump is daring judge to lock him up by intimidating jurors.
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 17, 2024 9:03 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (1 comments) [34 views]


A Playmate, a porn star, an ex-president and Mr. Pecker. Get plenty of popcorn!
Entertainment by Curt_Anderson     April 14, 2024 3:46 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (21 comments) [635 views]


Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price Faces Recall Vote After Crime Ravages Blue County
Crime by oldedude     April 16, 2024 1:38 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (3 comments) [132 views]


NPR editor Uri Berliner resigns after essay accusing outlet of liberal bias
Media by HatetheSwamp     April 17, 2024 9:25 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [93 views]


My oral report about the Battle of Gettisberg Gettysburg by Donnie Trump
Education by Curt_Anderson     April 16, 2024 7:25 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [31 views]


How is your Trump Media Stock doing?
Business by Curt_Anderson     April 4, 2024 11:47 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (20 comments) [513 views]


News outlets say presidential debates are essential. Wrong, they are a waste of time.
President by Curt_Anderson     April 14, 2024 12:32 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (14 comments) [773 views]


A federal judge rejected Rudy Giuliani’s request to reverse a massive defamation judgment
Law by Curt_Anderson     April 16, 2024 10:27 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (1 comments) [36 views]


Fact Check selectors, pages, etc.
2,000 Mules film bamboozles audiences
By Curt_Anderson
June 11, 2022 9:11 am
Category: Fact Check

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

The film “2000 Mules” uses a flawed analysis of cell phone geo-location data and ballot drop box surveillance footage to try and prove election fraud in the 2020 presidential election.

The movie suggests Democrat-organized “mules” were paid to illegally collect and drop off ballots in key battleground states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

The movie’s evidence is a combination of anonymous accounts and improper analysis of cell phone location data, which is not precise enough to confirm that somebody deposited a ballot into a drop box.

(Factcheck.org)A conservative film now playing in select theaters around the country isn’t “determinative, definitive” proof of widespread voter fraud, as former President Donald Trump has claimed.

“It’s called ‘2000 Mules,'” Trump said at a rally in Pennsylvania on May 7, “and basically [Joe] Biden didn’t get the votes, but he did get the ballots, okay, in a sense. But it’s an incredible, it’s an incredible documentary. … This exposes the fraud like nothing else.”

But the supposed evidence is speculative and does not provide the “definitive” proof that Trump and the filmmakers claim.


Cited and related links:

  1. factcheck.org

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "2,000 Mules film bamboozles audiences":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on June 11, 2022 9:43 am

    factcheck.org

    Bahahahahahahahahahaha!

    Nuff said.


  2. by Curt_Anderson on June 11, 2022 9:58 am
    HtS,
    Yes, I know fact checking organizations are Trump supporters' anathema.

    Will you take Donald Trump's word for it? He said, "but it’s an incredible, it’s an incredible documentary." You know, "incredible" as in the opposite of "credible".


  3. by HatetheSwamp on June 11, 2022 11:46 am

    Curt,

    So far, every comment on D’Souza's film that I've seen depicts him either as a prophet on the order of Elijah leading God's faithful into war against the worshipers of Baal...

    ...or a vile creature from hell who'd make the antichrist seem to be an amiable dinner companion.

    Nuthin I've seen seems objective.

    I haven't see 2,000 MULES and I won't. I do know that many people on the right are convinced that it's true and are preparing not to let you Dems get away with the crimes you committed in 020.

    As for you Blue MAGA Swampcult progressives? Your scurrilous "fact checking" comes across on the order of "doth protest too much."

    Either way, it seems to me, D'Souza wins. If he's correct (pb thinks he is), GOPs are not going to let your ilk do that again. If he's wrong? Nothing ventured, nothing gained.

    So, at best, GOPs benefit. At worst, they chase their tails.


  4. by HatetheSwamp on June 11, 2022 12:06 pm

    I haven’t heard from the #January6th Committee even though I’m one of the leading figures proving the “big lie” is not a lie and the 2020 election was stolen. I dare the committee to have me screen “2000 Mules” at their public hearing, and let’s see them refute it if they can. ~Dinesh D’Souza

    Wouldn't that be a hoot!!!!!?


Go To Top

Comment on: "2,000 Mules film bamboozles audiences"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page