by HatetheSwamp on March 3, 2022 4:28 am

The panel released its findings as part of a legal push to force John Eastman, an attorney who was a key driver of Trump’s strategy to subvert the 2020 election, to produce crucial emails tying together elements of the scheme they described.

Bahahahahahahahahahaha.

Now, I despise Trump. I think he's despicable. (Aw shucks. I forgot to take my Alzheimers meds again!)

So, as po often says, [They] got Hoosier.

They hope to have something but they need to find some way to "force" John Eastman to provide what they hope would be evidence.

Y'know? One difference between this Committee and a Grand Jury is that, to have served on the Committee, you have to have begun with the conviction that the person who is the focus of the inquiry is guilty...and, in this case, you have already voted to impeach him.

Trump may be guilty of something.

But, in spite of your headline, Curt, the article proves that this Committee still has nuthin and is now attempting to FORCE an attorney to give it material that may indicate that they might have something.

I remember.

I remember how, back in the day, you and po and the other TDSers here were convinced that, in a short time, the Committee would prove that Trump planned an insurrection.

Now, it's fallen to the position of needing to force the production of evidence that Trump...or maybe even only those in his inner circle...played around with how a 130 year old law was carried out.

Your Committee is a hoot.

And, you?...you're, uh, hootier.

I'll repeat. I think that the best thing for the GOP is that Trump could have been found to be guilty of something substantial.

Sadly for me, this article seems to prove, once and for all, that ain't happening.