Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo pressed House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) on Sunday about the lack of headway in House Republicans’
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 29, 2024 9:23 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (1 comments) [27 views]


Former GOP congressman David Jolley: even among Republicans puppies have a high favorability rating
Pets by Curt_Anderson     April 29, 2024 9:38 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [3 views]


"Let me start off with two words:" I support Biden. I support Biden.
Politics by HatetheSwamp     April 29, 2024 7:36 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [26 views]


Another dire 2024 poll for Joe Biden: Trump widens his lead over the President to 6% with just six months left to Election Day
Politics by HatetheSwamp     April 29, 2024 3:49 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [18 views]


Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (26 comments) [1319 views]


The silent Trump voter
Politics by HatetheSwamp     April 28, 2024 7:28 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (3 comments) [106 views]


Republicans: Do you know where your political donations are?
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 6:12 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: oldedude (13 comments) [456 views]


James Comer hopes for divine intervention to save him from embarrassing impeachment fiasco.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 24, 2024 7:05 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (5 comments) [144 views]


pb's Legal Goobers #s 2 & 3: The NY v Trump case is collapsing
Law by HatetheSwamp     April 26, 2024 3:43 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (6 comments) [56 views]


The Oval Office Oaf calls for "Four more years. Pause."
Entertainment by HatetheSwamp     April 24, 2024 2:56 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (6 comments) [112 views]


History selectors, pages, etc.
The only US Presidents who knew less about the Civil War than Trump were the ones who died before 1860.
By Curt_Anderson
January 6, 2024 11:01 pm
Category: History

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

Trump reminds me of middle schooler who didn't study attempting to BS his way through an oral report.
(CNN)“So many mistakes were made. See, there was something I think could have been negotiated, to be honest with you,” Trump said at a campaign event in Newton, Iowa. “I think you could have negotiated that. All the people died. So many people died.”

Trump did not say how he would have prevented the conflict, which he also called “so horrible but so fascinating.”

“It was, I don’t know, it was just different,” Trump said of the war. “I just find it – I’m so attracted to seeing it.”

After describing the wounds soldiers sustained on the battlefield, Trump said, “There’s nothing nice about it,” adding the war was a “tough one for our country.”

He also suggested that Lincoln would not have the same historical cachet “if he negotiated it.”

GOP former Rep. Liz Cheney slammed Trump’s take on social media, asking how Republicans who have endorsed the former president can “possibly defend this?”

“Which part of the Civil War ‘could have been negotiated’? The slavery part? The secession part? Whether Lincoln should have preserved the Union?” Cheney wrote. “Question for members of the GOP – the party of Lincoln – who have endorsed Donald Trump: How can you possibly defend this?”



Trump was equally ignorant about the Civil War in 2017
(The Hill)“People don’t realize, you know, the Civil War, if you think about it, why?” Trump said during the edition of “Main Street Meets the Beltway” scheduled to air on SiriusXM.

“People don’t ask that question, but why was there the Civil War? Why could that one not have been worked out?”











Cited and related links:

  1. cnn.com
  2. thehill.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "The only US Presidents who knew less about the Civil War than Trump were the ones who died before 1860.":

  1. by HatetheSwamp on January 7, 2024 8:23 am

    Thing is Trump negotiated N Korea into pausing the nuclear weapons and Putin out of attempting to seize Ukraine.

    Scoff away. But, Trump has a track record... a little NASCAR lingo, there.

    No matter how joyfully you practitioners of brainless TrumpHate may belittle Trump, you won't be able to link to Russia's attack on Ukraine or the crumbling of representative government in Afghanistan... all of which happened shortly after "that feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap" placed his hand on the Bible, nor blatant Hamas rapes murders of innocent Israelis...

    ...ain't!!!!!?


  2. by Curt_Anderson on January 7, 2024 10:43 am
    HtS,
    What are you talking about?

    North Korea conducted about two dozen test launches of missiles over the four years of the Trump presidency. All the while North Korea developed its nuclear and missile capabilities. What was negotiated by Trump?

    Putin delayed invading Ukraine at the request of China which hosted the Olympics. Trump now says he could "negotiate" an end to that war in 24 hours. Other than totally capitulating to Putin, no serious person believes Trump.
    everycrsreport.com
    cnn.com


  3. by HatetheSwamp on January 7, 2024 10:46 am

    Sorry.

    Cite a source that doesn't practice Stage 4 TrumpHate. We're exhausted at being lied to.


  4. by Curt_Anderson on January 7, 2024 11:00 am
    HtS,
    To save my and everybody else's time, you say which of these sites you accept as credible and those that you don't believe. Better yet, show us the sites that support your contentions about Trump.

    https://apnews.com
    https://mei.edu
    https://nypost.com
    https://thediplomat.com
    https://thehill.com
    https://www.agweb.com
    https://www.bloomberg.com
    https://www.businessinsider.com
    https://www.cbc.ca
    https://www.cnn.com
    https://www.dw.com
    https://www.independent.co.uk
    https://www.inquirer.com
    https://www.irishtimes.com
    https://www.japantimes.co.jp
    https://www.latimes.com
    https://www.marca.com
    https://www.nbcnews.com
    https://www.nytimes.com
    https://www.politico.eu
    https://www.reuters.com
    https://www.scmp.com
    https://www.theguardian.com
    https://www.themoscowtimes.com
    https://www.timesofisrael.com
    https://www.voanews.com

    google.com


  5. by HatetheSwamp on January 7, 2024 11:34 am

    Just curious, Curt, IYO how many of those are sources of unbiased and objective reporting on Trump?


  6. by Indy! on January 7, 2024 11:36 am

    Trump was the one who negotiated us out of Afghanistan. Not defending Biden because he's a horrible prez too - but the Afghanistan government was going to fail no matter when we left. The taliban runs that country.


  7. by oldedude on January 7, 2024 11:38 am
    North Korea conducted about two dozen test launches of missiles over the four years of the Trump presidency. All the while North Korea developed its nuclear and missile capabilities. What was negotiated by Trump?
    And here's the REST of the story...

    North Korea’s record year of missile testing is putting the world on edge

    In 2020, North Korea conducted four missile tests. In 2021, it doubled that number. In 2022, the isolated nation fired more missiles than any other year on record, at one point launching 23 missiles in a single day.

    North Korea has fired more than 90 cruise and ballistic missiles so far this year, showing off a range of weapons as experts warn of a potential nuclear test on the horizon.

    Though the tests themselves aren’t new, their sheer frequency marks a significant escalation that has put the Pacific region on edge.

    “The big thing about 2022 is that the word ‘test’ is no longer appropriate to talk about most North Korean missile launches – they are hardly testing missiles these days,” said Ankit Panda, a nuclear policy expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. “Everything we’ve seen this year suggests that Kim Jong Un is dead serious about using nuclear capabilities early in a conflict if necessary.”

    The attention-grabbing tests also threaten to set off an arms race in Asia, with nearby countries building up their militaries, and the United States promising to defend South Korea and Japan by the “full range of capabilities, including nuclear.”



    Here’s a look back at a year of weaponry and warnings – and what could come next.



  8. by oldedude on January 7, 2024 11:41 am
    Oh! Don't forget about China being able to fly communications recon on our bases that have nuclear weapons on them. Not only did he not stop them, he allowed them to exist until the end of their missions. Was that a payback for a diamond to jr? Dunno, we'll see at the trials.


  9. by Curt_Anderson on January 7, 2024 11:57 am
    HtS and OD,
    Before you two go off any more tangents, do you agree with and/or defend Trump's remarks about the Civil War? What would Trump have negotiated to avoid the Civil War?


  10. by HatetheSwamp on January 7, 2024 12:02 pm

    Indy,

    I've said all along that I oppose the withdrawal from Afghanistan. Curt, po, Donna...all support it. And. Trump did set it in motion but who thinks that he would have abandoned the Afghanis who assisted us and handed, what?, $70,000,000,000 of our weaponry over to the Taliban...and, ultimately to China and Russia?

    Biden acquired the sobriquet, "that feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap" from that historic disaster. He earned it well.


  11. by HatetheSwamp on January 7, 2024 12:04 pm

    I do. And, if you want to discuss the history, I will do that gladly.


  12. by Curt_Anderson on January 7, 2024 12:11 pm
    HtS,
    Trump is an ignoramus about the Civil War and many other topics. Discuss.


  13. by HatetheSwamp on January 7, 2024 12:37 pm

    Your interpretation defines nuance Curt.

    *****

    As you know, my degree is in American religious history... and more than anything else, 1820-1860.

    It was the mid 19th century equivalent of our evangelicals who pushed for the Civil War... on both sides... with religious, EFFINrighteous zeal.

    Like it or not, Trump's singular achievement in American politics is to have subordinated American evangelicals... in a way that no political figure ever has.

    It seems to me that if a Trump-like figure dominated the zeal of the religious activists, in both the north and the south, there very likely wouldn't have been the righteous passion for war. And, there might not have been a war.

    Ain't?


  14. by Curt_Anderson on January 7, 2024 12:45 pm
    It's not as if negotiations weren't thought of, even at the 11th hour.

    In April 1861, former president Pierce wrote to the other living former presidents and asked them to consider meeting to use their stature and influence to propose a negotiated end to the war. Pierce asked Van Buren to use his role as the senior living ex-president to issue a formal call. Van Buren's reply suggested that Buchanan should be the one to call the meeting, since he was the former president who had served most recently, or that Pierce should issue the call himself if he strongly believed in the merit of his proposal. Neither Buchanan nor Pierce was willing to make Pierce's proposal public, and nothing more resulted from it. Once the American Civil War began, Van Buren made public his support for the Union cause.
    en.wikipedia.org


  15. by oldedude on January 7, 2024 12:54 pm
    I freely admit that I'm ignorant about jet engine mechanics and avionics. I know that it takes a mixture of oxygen, fuel, and heat to set them off. The rest is FM to me. Flying a rotary aircraft. FM still.

    I think there are a lot of things I would know differently if I ran multiple global companies that I don't know now.

    Are we going to get into a gaff war between trumpster and pedojoe?


  16. by oldedude on January 7, 2024 1:00 pm
    Lead-"If God Is for Us, Who Can Be against Us"

    It's been used in every war, usually on both sides with different view of "God."
    biblestudytools.com


  17. by Curt_Anderson on January 7, 2024 1:10 pm
    "Sir, my concern is not whether God is on our side; my greatest concern is to be on God's side, for God is always right." ---Abraham Lincoln

    Trump didn't explain how he'd negotiate to avoid the Civil War. Nobody, here or elsewhere, has offered a credible suggestion/solution that both the North and South would have agreed to.


  18. by oldedude on January 7, 2024 1:15 pm
    Does that really matter? If they couldn't figure it out then, mostly because of political and cultural hatred between the groups, If he in an interview, why would he go into it then. It's an inane issue.


  19. by Curt_Anderson on January 7, 2024 1:28 pm
    OD,
    It matters that the president not be embarrassingly ignorant about one of the most important events in American history. It's completely moronic. What would be the compromise between slavery and no slavery? Spoiler alert: The Missouri Compromise managed to keep the peace—for the moment—it failed to resolve the pressing question of slavery and its place in the nation's future.


  20. by HatetheSwamp on January 7, 2024 1:29 pm

    Curt,

    Who, in your vast understanding of American history, has controlled religious activists in the way Trump has?

    If anyone could have diffused the righteous passion of the zealots on both sides, it would have been a political outsider like Trump whose strength is being a maestro in the art of the deal.


  21. by Curt_Anderson on January 7, 2024 1:36 pm
    "Who, in your vast understanding of American history, has controlled religious activists in the way Trump has?" ---HtS

    Jim Jones.



  22. by HatetheSwamp on January 7, 2024 2:09 pm

    I guess that I take game, set and match. Eh.


  23. by oldedude on January 7, 2024 2:47 pm
    It matters that the president not be embarrassingly ignorant about one of the most important events in American history. It's completely moronic. What would be the compromise between slavery and no slavery? Spoiler alert: The Missouri Compromise managed to keep the peace—for the moment—it failed to resolve the pressing question of slavery and its place in the nation's future.

    So if this were pedojoe, would you say the same thing? Or would you hide behind him and yell TRUMPTRUMP. TRUMPTRUMP TRUMPTRUMP TRUMPTRUMP.....


  24. by Curt_Anderson on January 7, 2024 3:10 pm
    If Biden had said what Trump said, Biden would have deserved the insults and derision. But Biden didn't and wouldn't. Last week Biden answered the question that Nikki Haley was unable to answer about the Civil War: "It was about slavery".

    Beyond Trump's ignorance about the Civil War, why is he talking about it? It wasn't because of Haley's verbal stumble last week. It's Trump's narcissism that causes him to expose his ignorance. Trump wants to pretend that he would have done a better job than Lincoln. Also in that Iowa speech he continues to denigrate the late John McCain.

    Why do most Republicans and others support Trump? It's a national embarrassment that people have voted for that bloviating buffoon.


  25. by oldedude on January 7, 2024 6:05 pm
    Why do most Republicans and others support Trump? It's a national embarrassment that people have voted for that bloviating buffoon.
    And the option is soooooo much worse.


  26. by Curt_Anderson on January 7, 2024 6:19 pm
    OD,
    At this point the options include a few Republicans, normal intelligent people even if I don’t share their political views. So why do most Republican voters favor Trump?


  27. by oldedude on January 7, 2024 7:07 pm
    They don't. They despise the opposition. From the DOJ going after parents trying to raise their children, sending agents into mainstream Catholic churches to look for sedition and radical forces. Taking air marshals away from securing aircraft to go down to the border to do "administrative work." Biden admin tracking all Americans who traveled to DC on Jan. 6, 2021, even if you didn't partake in any of the issues at the capital.

    Continual illegal EO's and laws from governors regarding 2A (There have been 38 cases that have been overturned from 2021-2023).

    So, did you need anything besides using the DOJ illegally, spying on citizens, and generally wiping their asses with the constitution, why do you think?
    americanmilitarynews.com
    giffords.org
    msn.com


  28. by HatetheSwamp on January 8, 2024 3:28 am

    Last week Biden answered the question that Nikki Haley was unable to answer about the Civil War: "It was about slavery".


    I find this fascinating. Our own isle, channeling Heather?, has been saying exactly what Haley said:

    The south won the Civil War because states rights is what rocks today.

    The war was about how the nation will be governed.

    Be the moron that you choose to be, Curt, but Lincoln fought the war to preserve the EFFINUnion. He didn't issue The Emancipation Proclamation until more than two years after the war began... until it was all but certain that the Union army would win the war.

    Every wonder why the north's army is called the UNION ARMY? Because the war was about the union.

    Moron.

    You, Curt, are the one who's ignernt. You believe a fourth grader's myths. You ain't, most certainly, smarter than a fifth grader.

    Haley's answer wasn't woke, nor politically savy. But?, accurate? Absolutely.


  29. by oldedude on January 8, 2024 4:31 am
    And remember, Lincoln couldn't politically free "all" slaves. The north wouldn't have it. The north also had an out. They still had "white ni****," known as the Irish. I've talked about this before. So although the north didn't have the agriculture the south did, they had industry and used the same techniques the south did in agriculture.

    And the sweatshops still exist in the US, usually fulfilled by those "immigrants" you so lovingly want in the country, nail salons, and brothels.


  30. by HatetheSwamp on January 8, 2024 6:00 am

    Exactly, OD.

    There was a passionate segment of the population that saw the elimination of, or preservation of, slavery as what the war was about... but there are many reasons the war happened.

    And, isle's argument that the south wanted a weak central government was more critical than slavery.


  31. by islander on January 8, 2024 6:38 am

    The reason the South was afraid of democracy and a strong central government was the fact that the South’s economy was dependent on slavery and they knew and feared what would happen if the slaves were freed and allowed to vote.

    The elite Southern plantation owners absolutely did not believe in or accept what our Declaration of Independence made clear:

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed”


  32. by HatetheSwamp on January 8, 2024 7:00 am

    The reason the South was afraid of democracy and a strong central government...

    Democracy AND strong central government. isle, the way I've always the meaning of those two concepts, combining them is an oxymoron.

    The elite Southern plantation owners absolutely did not believe in or accept what our Declaration of Independence made clear...


    More likely? They interpreted the declaration in a different way.

    From the end of Washington's presidency on there have always been two political traditions in the United States, one of which emphasizes the importance of the central government, t'other that ours is a connection of merely interdependent states...who fund, as an example, a military for the mutual protection of all states.

    It would not be accurate to suggest that support of a strong central government has always been mainstream thinking and that the notion that the rights of the individual, and of the states, has always been fringe. That's what I'm afraid you're doing.

    isle,...the Tenth Amendment is the punchline of the Bill of Rights.


  33. by islander on January 8, 2024 8:37 am

    Interpreted it differently means they didn’t accept what the Declaration said…that all men are created equal.

    You can go through all your mental gymnastics, all your rationalizing, and even play semantic games with the words but you can’t make it true that those elite Southern plantation owners who owned, bought, and sold people believed that the people they owned and sold were their equals.

    ” It would not be accurate to suggest that support of a strong central government has always been mainstream thinking and that the notion that the rights of the individual, and of the states, has always been fringe. That's what I'm afraid you're doing.”

    You really don’t understand the American Paradox, what it is or what it means, do you Hate !!




  34. by oldedude on January 8, 2024 8:46 am
    Sorry Lead- I'm gonna add 2c

    The reason the South was afraid of democracy and a strong central government was the fact that the South’s economy was dependent on slavery and they knew and feared what would happen if the slaves were freed and allowed to vote.
    I don't think they "feared" a strong central government. They actually knew that's what the founders set up in the Second Constitutional Congress (the one we have now). And even with a strong central (read big brother) REPUBLIC, not much would change. The north needed cotton to stay alive in the clothing mills (read sweatshops) of the north. In order to produce those "ready made" garments, thousands of workers were hired for long hours, little pay, and sometimes chained to their chairs to ensure they didn't take breaks between the scheduled breaks. In one case it resulted in the deaths of 147 workers at the "Triangle Shirtwaist" factory when a fire broke out and the owners/managers fled with workers chained to their machinery.

    The elite Southern plantation owners absolutely did not believe in or accept what our Declaration of Independence made clear...
    At that time and much to the Dismay of Jefferson and Madison, blacks and slaves in general were not considered "human." This included indentured servants, which were used until the 1900s.
    pbs.org
    heddels.com
    history.com


  35. by HatetheSwamp on January 8, 2024 9:13 am

    Interpreted it differently means they didn’t accept what the Declaration said…that all men are created equal.


    Among other things.

    And, as OD pointed out accurately and brilliantly...people outside the south shared that opinion.

    ...can’t make it true that those elite Southern plantation owners who owned, bought, and sold people believed that the people they owned and sold were their equals.


    Yet, not they alone.

    You really don’t understand the American Paradox, what it is or what it means, do you Hate !!

    Obviously not, Mr UNDERSTAND MAN. Please splain to us.


  36. by islander on January 8, 2024 9:42 am

    "You really don’t understand the American Paradox, what it is or what it means, do you Hate !!" ~ isle

    "Obviously not, Mr UNDERSTAND MAN. Please splain to us" ~Hate.

    "The rise of liberty and equality in this country was accompanied by the rise of slavery. That two such contradictory developments were taking place simultaneously over a long period of our history, from the seventeenth century to the nineteenth, is the central paradox of American history."

    I'm sure that you probably know who Edmund S Morgan is. Click the link and read what he says in the short pdf and that will hopefully help you to have a better understanding of The American Paradox.
    iea.usp.br


  37. by HatetheSwamp on January 8, 2024 10:40 am

    "The rise of liberty and equality in this country was accompanied by the rise of slavery. That two such contradictory developments were taking place simultaneously over a long period of our history, from the seventeenth century to the nineteenth, is the central paradox of American history."

    I'm sure that you probably know who Edmund S Morgan is. Click the link and read what he says in the short pdf and that will hopefully help you to have a better understanding of The American Paradox.


    That's lovely...but irrelevant to what I'm discussing.


  38. by islander on January 8, 2024 10:59 am

    "That's lovely...but irrelevant to what I'm discussing." ~ Hate

    It's vital to what we're discussing even though you don't understand why.



  39. by Indy! on January 8, 2024 11:14 am
    Peebs...

    Indy,

    I've said all along that I oppose the withdrawal from Afghanistan. Curt, po, Donna...all support it. And. Trump did set it in motion but who thinks that he would have abandoned the Afghanis who assisted us and handed, what?, $70,000,000,000 of our weaponry over to the Taliban...and, ultimately to China and Russia?

    Biden acquired the sobriquet, "that feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap" from that historic disaster. He earned it well.



    I have no doubt Trump would have left the weapons too, peebs. We did that on purpose - just like we did in Iraq. You really think we forgot to move the shit out that we wanted? How many U.S. dignitaries did we "forget" in those countries? How many military contractors and VIPs plundering the countries for their resources did we "forget"? Zero. We left all that stuff there on purpose - so the taliban will be armed and ready for the next extended conflict we already have on the drawing board for the middle east and Afghanistan.


  40. by HatetheSwamp on January 8, 2024 11:29 am


    "That's lovely...but irrelevant to what I'm discussing." ~ Hate

    It's vital to what we're discussing even though you don't understand why.


    Please connect the dots for us.


  41. by Ponderer on January 8, 2024 11:30 am

    US troops and their allies feel humiliated after [Donald Trump orders their] abandoning their bases in Syria to be taken over by gleeful Russians

    Oct 16, 2019

    Russian troops and their Syrian allies Wednesday quickly moved to assert their new power in Syria after this week's humiliating retreat by US forces in the wake of an invasion by Turkey.

    For US and coalition soldiers, the spectacle was made worse by Russian glee at taking over multiple US military bases which were hastily abandoned.

    Here is a video from the pro-Kremlin ANNA news network, which appears to show the inside of a base in Manbij, with abandoned tents, drinks coolers, and books. A Russian flag has been drawn on a white board.

    The roughly 1,000 US soldiers — along with hundreds of French, Danish and British allies — have been forced to abandon positions along Syria's shared border with Turkey.

    At the same time, Turkish troops and their proxies are pressing into Syria in a controversial campaign to eliminate Kurdish separatists that had allied with the US against ISIS.

    The Kurdish response was to invite Russia and the Syrian regime into the eastern third of the country which they had governed autonomously for nearly eight years.

    "Humiliation doesn't begin to cover what the US forces are feeling right now," said a military official with the anti-ISIS coalition.




    Sometimes it would be better for some people to simply shut the fuckup with their fuckingasshole MAGA Republican hypocrisy and not say anything.


  42. by Ponderer on January 8, 2024 11:30 am

    Link for the above.....
    businessinsider.com


  43. by islander on January 8, 2024 11:58 am

    "Please connect the dots for us." ~ Hate

    Why?

    Are you having that much of a problem understanding all of this? Now you need somebody to connect the dots for you?


  44. by HatetheSwamp on January 8, 2024 12:27 pm

    isle,

    I do need someone to connect the dots. po's been pointing out, since The ONE was President, that I'm too stoopid to be a progressive. Take po's word as gospel.


  45. by oldedude on January 8, 2024 1:16 pm
    Po- Your post was interesting. You know that comes from the Wagner Group that fought in Ukraine, don't you? It's a group made of murderers and rapists with life sentences.

    I dunno, I just had to laugh!🤣


  46. by islander on January 8, 2024 2:05 pm

    " po's been pointing out, since The ONE was President, that I'm too stoopid to be a progressive. Take po's word as gospel." ~ Hate

    Pondy has always been spot on whenever she has described you.


  47. by HatetheSwamp on January 8, 2024 2:18 pm

    No doubt. po never lies and po's always right, baha.

    I await your dot connection.


  48. by islander on January 8, 2024 2:37 pm

    You should start listening to what Ponderer says, Hate...You could learn a lot about yourself.


  49. by HatetheSwamp on January 8, 2024 2:57 pm

    So, you're making things up? It's time to put up or shut up. No pressure


Go To Top

Comment on: "The only US Presidents who knew less about the Civil War than Trump were the ones who died before 1860."


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page