By HatetheSwamp November 6, 2022 7:05 am Category: Politics (0.0 from 0 votes) Rules of the Post Write A New Article How To Post Here Rate this article (5=best, 0=poor)

1. The GOP has an extremely weak candidate for governor. Donna often demeans a significant portion of the electorate as being "low information." While pb rejects the self-righteousness packed into that judgment, pb knows that some people who vote don't watch cable news daily. Some vote because they've been taught it's their civic duty. pb notes that pollsters say that those voters tend not to split their ballot. It's likely that Oz will lose out because the marquee race here is the gubernatorial race and many who vote Dem for governor will vote Dem for Senate.

2. Pennsylvania Dems cheat. I've recounted the appearance of eminent pollsters Matt Towery and Robert Cahaly on Fox on Friday. Both agreed. Oz will almost certainly will get more votes but...the way Pennsylvania counts votes is the driving issue, i.e., Dems cheat. pb has posted whistle-blower videos proving that Philadelphia area Dems destroyed the chain of evidence with mail-in ballots. Nothing has been done with real evidence. In Pennsylvania Dems cheat...and get away with it.

For pb, it feels like Oz is leading among people who will cast ballots...

...but Fetterman,most likely, will win the Senate seat.

Comments Start Below

by Donna on November 6, 2022 7:16 am "pb has posted whistle-blower videos proving that Philadelphia area Dems destroyed the chain of evidence with mail-in ballots. Nothing has been done with real evidence. In Pennsylvania Dems cheat...and get away with it." - Hts Bullshit. You have nothing. by HatetheSwamp on November 6, 2022 7:21 am How are actual real life whistle-blower videos nothing? Talk about election deniers. You're a truth denier. A reality denier!!!! C'mon man. Gimme a break! by Donna on November 6, 2022 7:23 am All you ever evidence ever indicates are gross misinterpretations of what those supposed whistleblowers believe they saw. by HatetheSwamp on November 6, 2022 7:32 am In what way are they not only misrepresentations?, they're GROSS misrepresentations? Lies, in other words. I think that I need you to explain that. by Donna on November 6, 2022 7:39 am Ever case you've brought here has been easily debunked. If they had any real evidence, their cases would have already been argued in court. by HatetheSwamp on November 6, 2022 7:52 am So, since I forget. Remind me. How did you debunk the evidence in those Pennsylvania whistle-blower videos!!!!!? by Donna on November 6, 2022 7:54 am I don't remember the details, but I remember that as having been debunked. Curt probably remembers. If you guys had a bona fide case, it would have been accepted by the courts. by Curt_Anderson on November 6, 2022 8:09 am Donna, I can predict that HTS will not see your impeccable logic when you pointed out that the case was never brought to court. To most people that would be obvious, but we’re dealing with people who cannot understand that losing 60+ cases in court is a pretty good indication that there was no vote rigging in the 2020 election. Asked for a Dr. Oz’s chances, yesterday there was this: Trump called both Mastriano and Oz up to speak. Mastriano praised Trump saying the state needed him, while Oz made a brief appeal to the crowd to get out and vote. In a fumble, Oz told the crowd to contact 10 people Sunday morning before the NFL’s Pittsburgh Steelers game -- however, the Steelers are on their bye this week and aren’t playing this weekend. by HatetheSwamp on November 6, 2022 8:13 am You remember WRONG! You really are a reality denier. You don't know how they were debunked... ...but you know that they were! Bahahahahahahahahahaha. Donna. RCP, in the real world, just ranked Cahaly and Towery the 1st and 3rd most accurate pollsters...they both said on Friday that the counting of votes in Pennsylvania is a problem and that they both think Oz will get more votes but refuse to predict that Oz will win the election. Debunk that they said that! realclearpolitics.com realclearpolitics.com by Donna on November 6, 2022 8:27 am There's nothing about voter fraud in either link unless there's something in that video, which I didn't watch. It's very simple: If there's was a legitimate case to be made, it would have been accepted by the court system. by HatetheSwamp on November 6, 2022 8:50 am You're stunning. Two of RCP's three highest rated pollsters refuse to predict the Pennsylvania result because of the way Pennsylvania counts votes and there's nothing about voter fraud in the video!!!!!? Okay. Gotcha. Politics is ugly. Tammany Hall. Jim Crow. Richard Daley (all Dem) prove that, in American history on both sides. Certainly, over the centuries, Dem cheating has been more flamboyant and more unabashed. But politics is ugly. All over. The sentence pb types here most often on SS is: Trump is despicable. Somewhere not far behind is pb quoting Cathy McCollum calling Biden "that feckless dementia-ridden piece of crap." pb lives in reality. He acknowledges that politics and politicians are ugly but, for Donna, GOPs are evil and Dems are saintly. Even as these eminent pollsters merely report that the honesty of the vote count in Pennsylvania is an issue, you won't consider the possibility that Pennsylvania Dems have zits. I can't take you seriously...on this issue. And, I can't help wondering what's going on with you inside. by Curt_Anderson on November 6, 2022 9:05 am HTS, you cited the two guys who you think are the second and third best pollsters. Those two men are the principles in the Trafalgar group poll taking company. They indicate in their polls that Dr. Oz is ahead of John Fetterman—-that essentially is their prediction. However, since it’s with in the margin of error, they don’t want to make a definitive prediction. If I am wrong, show me where the Trafalgar group claims that they don’t want to poll Pennsylvanians because of alleged voter fraud. realclearpolitics.com by HatetheSwamp on November 6, 2022 9:23 am Matt Towery is from the Insider Advantage poll. Both pollsters said that they won't predict a winner because of the way votes are counted in Pennsylvania. If you watched that video, which I've entered twice, they were willing to call winners in races that they have being closer than Pennsylvania's...expressing personal opinion. Their opinion about Pennsylvania is that the issue is the way votes are counted. Why is it so hard for you to acknowledge that elections in Pennsylvania can be less than honest? To quote Jane Austen, "It's a truth universally acknowledged." Other than for a handful of Good German Blue MAGAs. by Curt_Anderson on November 6, 2022 9:32 am HtS, You are attempting to convince others and yourself that opinions are an acceptable substitute for evidence. Your impression of what these two poll takers say is a variation of your claim that there was voter fraud, because polls indicate that most Republicans think there was voter fraud. by Donna on November 6, 2022 9:34 am What supposedly is wrong about the way votes are counted in PA? Give me a synopsis. If there's something illegal going on in the way votes are counted, why hasn't that been heard in court? That's why I doubt that those guys have any admissible evidence. Go To Top

Find old posts & articles

Show Most Recent Articles Articles by category: Politics+ Religion+ Law & Crime Military News Media History Health Sports+ Humor Entertainment Misc.

Report spam & abuse SelectSmart.com home page