Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Prosecution eviscerates a main defense argument.
Law by Curt_Anderson     May 28, 2024 6:15 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (13 comments) [170 views]


RFK Jr. files complaint with Federal Election Commission over CNN debate criteria
Politics by Curt_Anderson     May 29, 2024 7:31 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (2 comments) [35 views]


Trump trial jury instructions
Law by Curt_Anderson     May 29, 2024 9:00 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: (0 comments) [22 views]


Politico: Dems in full-blown ‘freakout’ over Biden
President by HatetheSwamp     May 28, 2024 6:44 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (18 comments) [178 views]


Drudge Trump verdict poll
Crime by HatetheSwamp     May 29, 2024 12:20 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (4 comments) [41 views]


Libertarians reject Robert F Kennedy, Jr., Trump and Stormy Daniels as their party nominee.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     May 26, 2024 2:19 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (4 comments) [86 views]


Kennedy blasts Biden, Trump over pandemic measures in pitch at Libertarian convention
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 25, 2024 3:59 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (31 comments) [308 views]


My prediction that Trump will sabotage his own defense during closing arguments.
Law by Curt_Anderson     May 27, 2024 10:38 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (12 comments) [128 views]


Judge Cannon rejects request for gag order against Donald Trump in classified docs case
Crime by HatetheSwamp     May 28, 2024 9:41 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (5 comments) [66 views]


Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector and the election
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 2.5) Last comment by: Indy! (86 comments) [2652 views]


Gay & Lesbian selectors, pages, etc.
Supreme Court Lets Idaho Enforce Ban on Gender Care for Transgender Youth
By HatetheSwamp
April 15, 2024 5:12 pm
Category: Gay & Lesbian

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

The justices' order Monday allows the state to put in a place a 2023 law that subjects physicians to up to 10 years in prison if they provide hormones, puberty blockers or other gender-affirming care to people under age 18. Under the court’s order, the two transgender teens who sued to challenge the law still will be able to obtain care.

A federal judge in Idaho had blocked the law in its entirety after determining that it was necessary to do so to protect the teens, who are identified under pseudonyms in court papers.

At least 23 states have enacted laws restricting or banning gender medical care for transgender minors, and most of those states face lawsuits. A federal judge struck down Arkansas’ ban as unconstitutional. Montana’s ban also is temporarily on hold.


Cited and related links:

  1. newsmax.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Supreme Court Lets Idaho Enforce Ban on Gender Care for Transgender Youth":

  1. by oldedude on April 15, 2024 10:16 pm
    So the courts are saying that a "child" is in fact a "child." If you can charge parents with an act the children do up until the age of 18 then they are NOT wards of the state, but children the parents have rights and responsibilities of and to until the children are 18. What a concept!

    So when your "child" has oral surgery, the parents must sign for the "patient." if your "child" has "issues" in school, the "parents" must be notified. If the "children" are taken from the "parents" there must be a warrant, cause, and order from the state for the legal "reason" the parents do not ha custody of the "children." Or when someone picks your child from school, the "parents" must "sign" for that "person" as a "legally responsible" person for that child. Notice in all of this paragraph, the state has ZERO responsibility to raise, or groom your child as their own without a court order and DUE F***ING PROCESS!"

    My bet is that everyone that doesn't hold any "rights" of daily "parenting" has any desire to raise their children or feel the need to raise their grandchildren in such a way. They don't understand what it takes in a parental dispute (where one parent is abusive to the child) to pick them up from school without legal consent.



  2. by HatetheSwamp on April 16, 2024 3:17 am

    And, we know that we have at least one Justice who doesn't know what a woman is.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Supreme Court Lets Idaho Enforce Ban on Gender Care for Transgender Youth"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page