Comments posted organically
SelectSmart.com Homepage
Display Order:

Anonymous comments regarding the Presidential Candidate Selector
President by Curt_Anderson     March 19, 2024 10:10 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (31 comments) [1410 views]


New poll reveals demographic voter shifts. Biden leads Trump, especially among "definitely voting" voters.
Politics by Curt_Anderson     May 2, 2024 11:04 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Curt_Anderson (4 comments) [64 views]


Professor who correctly predicted 9 presidential elections weighs in on Biden vs. Trump
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 30, 2024 9:33 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (3 comments) [46 views]


The pro-Palestinian campus protests are not very well thought out.
Opinion by Curt_Anderson     May 1, 2024 10:21 am (Rating: 5.0) Last comment by: Indy! (13 comments) [267 views]


Baha. Pro-Israel and Pro-Palestine protesters join in chanting "Eff Joe Biden!"
Politics by HatetheSwamp     May 2, 2024 3:34 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [13 views]


Our President speaks about college unrest
President by HatetheSwamp     May 2, 2024 9:32 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [20 views]


Trump court situation must be REALLY boring
Soap Opera by Indy!     May 1, 2024 2:08 pm (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (4 comments) [71 views]


The WA GOP put it in writing that they’re not into democracy
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 30, 2024 8:55 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (13 comments) [286 views]


Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo pressed House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) on Sunday about the lack of headway in House Republicans’
Politics by Curt_Anderson     April 29, 2024 9:23 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: HatetheSwamp (3 comments) [151 views]


Michael Moore appears on CNN to appeal directly to Joe Biden
Politics by HatetheSwamp     April 30, 2024 4:49 am (Rating: 0.0) Last comment by: Indy! (1 comments) [48 views]


Gay & Lesbian selectors, pages, etc.
Supreme Court Lets Idaho Enforce Ban on Gender Care for Transgender Youth
By HatetheSwamp
April 15, 2024 5:12 pm
Category: Gay & Lesbian

(0.0 from 0 votes)
Rules of the Post

SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com SelectSmart.com


Rate this article
5 Stars
4 Stars
3 Stars
2 Stars
1 Star
0 Stars
(5=best, 0=poor)

The justices' order Monday allows the state to put in a place a 2023 law that subjects physicians to up to 10 years in prison if they provide hormones, puberty blockers or other gender-affirming care to people under age 18. Under the court’s order, the two transgender teens who sued to challenge the law still will be able to obtain care.

A federal judge in Idaho had blocked the law in its entirety after determining that it was necessary to do so to protect the teens, who are identified under pseudonyms in court papers.

At least 23 states have enacted laws restricting or banning gender medical care for transgender minors, and most of those states face lawsuits. A federal judge struck down Arkansas’ ban as unconstitutional. Montana’s ban also is temporarily on hold.


Cited and related links:

  1. newsmax.com

Comments Start Below


The views and claims expressed by contributors are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views and beliefs of SelectSmart.com. Not every statement made here can be assumed to be a fact.
Comments on "Supreme Court Lets Idaho Enforce Ban on Gender Care for Transgender Youth":

  1. by oldedude on April 15, 2024 10:16 pm
    So the courts are saying that a "child" is in fact a "child." If you can charge parents with an act the children do up until the age of 18 then they are NOT wards of the state, but children the parents have rights and responsibilities of and to until the children are 18. What a concept!

    So when your "child" has oral surgery, the parents must sign for the "patient." if your "child" has "issues" in school, the "parents" must be notified. If the "children" are taken from the "parents" there must be a warrant, cause, and order from the state for the legal "reason" the parents do not ha custody of the "children." Or when someone picks your child from school, the "parents" must "sign" for that "person" as a "legally responsible" person for that child. Notice in all of this paragraph, the state has ZERO responsibility to raise, or groom your child as their own without a court order and DUE F***ING PROCESS!"

    My bet is that everyone that doesn't hold any "rights" of daily "parenting" has any desire to raise their children or feel the need to raise their grandchildren in such a way. They don't understand what it takes in a parental dispute (where one parent is abusive to the child) to pick them up from school without legal consent.



  2. by HatetheSwamp on April 16, 2024 3:17 am

    And, we know that we have at least one Justice who doesn't know what a woman is.


Go To Top

Comment on: "Supreme Court Lets Idaho Enforce Ban on Gender Care for Transgender Youth"


* Anonymous comments are subject to approval before they appear. Cookies Consent Policy & Privacy Statement. All Rights Reserved. SelectSmart® is a registered trademark. | Contact SelectSmart.com | Advertise on SelectSmart.com | This site is for sale!

Find old posts & articles

Articles by category:

SelectSmart.com
Report spam & abuse
SelectSmart.com home page